Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques

dc.contributor.authorBurks, Joshua D.
dc.contributor.authorConner, Andrew K.
dc.contributor.authorBonney, Phillip A.
dc.contributor.authorArcher, Jacob B.
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Blake
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorSafavi-Abbasi, Sam
dc.contributor.authorSughrue, Michael
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Neurological Surgery, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T17:33:58Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T17:33:58Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-27
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the senior author from January 2012 to June 2013. Thirty-one meningiomas were resected in 27 patients, including 9 supratentorial, 5 anterior fossa, 7 middle fossa, 6 posterior fossa, and 4 complex skull base tumors. Twenty-nine tumors were WHO Grade I, and 2 were Grade II. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 8 hours, 22 minutes (range, 2:55-16:14) for skull-base tumors, and 4 hours, 27 minutes (range, 1:45-7:13) for supratentorial tumors. Simpson Resection grades were as follows: Grade I = 8, II = 8, III = 1, IV = 15, V = 0. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-20 days). In the 9 patients presenting with some degree of visual loss, 7 saw improvement or complete resolution. In the 6 patients presenting with cranial nerve palsies, 4 experienced improvement or resolution of the deficit postoperatively. Four patients experienced new neurologic deficits, all of which were improved or resolved at the time of the last follow-up. Technical aspects and surgical nuances of these approaches for management of intracranial meningiomas are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: With careful preoperative evaluation, keyhole approaches can be utilized singly or in combination to manage meningiomas in a wide variety of locations with satisfactory results.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationBurks, J. D., Conner, A. K., Bonney, P. A., Archer, J. B., Christensen, B., Smith, J., … Sughrue, M. (2016). Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques. Cureus, 8(4), e588. http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/12221
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCureus, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7759/cureus.588en_US
dc.relation.journalCureusen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectcraniotomyen_US
dc.subjecteyebrowen_US
dc.subjectkeyholeen_US
dc.subjectmeningiomaen_US
dc.subjectpterionalen_US
dc.subjectretrosigmoiden_US
dc.subjectsupraorbitalen_US
dc.subjecttumor resectionen_US
dc.titleManagement of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cureus-0008-000000000588.pdf
Size:
3.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: