Is intraoperative MRI use in malignant brain tumor surgery a health care burden? A matched analysis of MarketScan Database

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Mayur
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dengzhi
dc.contributor.authorPalmisciano, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorUgiliweneza, Beatrice
dc.contributor.authorWoo, Shiao
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Megan
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Donald
dc.contributor.authorSavage, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorBoakye, Maxwell
dc.contributor.authorAndaluz, Norberto
dc.contributor.authorMistry, Akshitkumar M.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Clark C.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams , Brian J.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurological Surgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-23T18:10:59Z
dc.date.available2024-05-23T18:10:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a useful adjunct for resection of primary malignant brain tumors (MBTs). The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of iMRI on health care utilization in patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of MBTs. Materials and methods: MarketScan database were queried using the ICD-9/10 and CPT 4th edition, from 2008 to 2020. We included patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent a craniotomy with at-least one year follow-up. Outcomes were length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, hospital/emergency room (ER) re-admissions, outpatient services, medication refills and corresponding payments. Results: Of 6,640 patients who underwent craniotomy for MBTs, 465 patients (7%) had iMRI used during the procedure with 0.7% per year increase in iMRI use during the study period. Patients without iMRI use had higher complications at index hospitalization compared to those with iMRI use (19% vs. 14%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in the ER admission rates among the patients who underwent surgery with and without iMRI use at 6-months and 1-year after the index procedure. In terms of post-discharge payments, no significant differences were noted among the patients without and with iMRI use at 6-months ($81,107 vs. $ 81,458, p = 0.26) and 1-year ($132,657 vs. $ 118,113, p = 0.12). Conclusion: iMRI use during craniotomy for MBT gradually increased during the study period. iMRI did not result in higher payments at index hospitalization, 6-months, and 1-year after the index procedure.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationSharma, M., Wang, D., Palmisciano, P., Ugiliweneza, B., Woo, S., Nelson, M., Miller, D., Savage, J., Boakye, M., Andaluz, N., Mistry, A. M., Chen, C. C., & Williams, B. J. (2022). Is intraoperative MRI use in malignant brain tumor surgery a health care burden? A matched analysis of MarketScan Database. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 160(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04142-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40996
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11060-022-04142-0
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourceAuthor
dc.subjectHealthcare utilizatio
dc.subjectIntraoperative MRI
dc.subjectMalignant brain tumor
dc.subjectNational database
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleIs intraoperative MRI use in malignant brain tumor surgery a health care burden? A matched analysis of MarketScan Database
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sharma2022Intraoperative-AAM.pdf
Size:
525.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: