Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction

dc.contributor.authorBadman, Brian L.
dc.contributor.authorBaessler, Aaron M.
dc.contributor.authorMoor, Molly
dc.contributor.departmentOrthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T16:50:34Z
dc.date.available2020-10-15T16:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-16
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the short-term outcomes of 10 patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft. Methods Between 2016 and 2018, patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled for treatment with arthroscopic SCR. Investigational review board approval was achieved. All patients were treated by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Range of motion and functional outcome according to visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were assessed preoperatively and at routine follow-up intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound were obtained at a minimum of 1 year to assess graft integrity and to correlate clinical outcomes. Results Ten patients with a mean age of 58.6 years had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. In all patients, preoperatively to postoperatively, mean forward flexion improved from 141° to 173° (P = .018), mean visual analog scale pain score decreased from 6.5 to 1 (P = .004), and mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 43 to 87 (P = .005). At 1 year, ultrasound evaluation identified graft failure in 1 patient (10%), whereas MRI diagnosed graft failure in 7 patients (70%). Of the 7 failures diagnosed by MRI, 4 failed at the level of the glenoid, 2 failed mid-graft, and 1 failed at the humerus. Conclusions Although clinical outcomes are statistically improved following arthroscopic SCR using a dermal allograft, the early high failure rates of the graft raise concerns about the long-term outcomes of the procedure. Furthermore, the use of ultrasound alone to validate an intact graft should be used with caution, as failures can occur at the glenoid and can be missed without MRI correlation. Level of Evidence Level IV, Therapeutic case seriesen_US
dc.identifier.citationBadman, B. L., Baessler, A. M., & Moor, M. (2020). Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2(3), e229–e235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.006en_US
dc.identifier.issn2666-061Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24099
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.006en_US
dc.relation.journalArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectSuperior Capsular Reconstructionen_US
dc.titleShort-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
main (7).pdf
Size:
647.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: