Assessing Psychological Well-Being: Self-Report Instruments for the NIH Toolbox

dc.contributor.authorSalsman, John M.
dc.contributor.authorLai, Jin-Shei
dc.contributor.authorHendrie, Hugh C.
dc.contributor.authorButt, Zeeshan
dc.contributor.authorZill, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorPilkonis, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorStoney, Catherine M.
dc.contributor.authorBrouwers, Pim
dc.contributor.authorCella, David
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T18:42:12Z
dc.date.available2015-12-01T18:42:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-02
dc.description.abstractObjective— Psychological well-being (PWB) has a significant relationship with physical and mental health. As part of the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function, we developed self-report item banks and short forms to assess PWB. Study Design and Setting— Expert feedback and literature review informed the selection of PWB concepts and the development of item pools for Positive Affect, Life Satisfaction, and Meaning and Purpose. Items were tested with a community-dwelling U.S. internet panel sample of adults aged 18 and above (N=552). Classical and item response theory (IRT) approaches were used to evaluate unidimensionality, fit of items to the overall measure, and calibrations of those items, including differential item function (DIF). Results— IRT-calibrated item banks were produced for Positive Affect (34 items), Life Satisfaction (16 items), and Meaning and Purpose (18 items). Their psychometric properties were supported based on results of factor analysis, fit statistics, and DIF evaluation. All banks measured the concepts precisely (reliability ≥0.90) for more than 98% of participants. Conclusion— These adult scales and item banks for PWB provide the flexibility, efficiency, and precision necessary to promote future epidemiological, observational, and intervention research on the relationship of PWB with physical and mental health.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSalsman, J. M., Lai, J.-S., Hendrie, H. C., Butt, Z., Zill, N., Pilkonis, P. A., … Cella, D. (2014). Assessing Psychological Well-Being: Self-Report Instruments for the NIH Toolbox. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(1), 205–215. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0452-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/7572
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11136-013-0452-3en_US
dc.relation.journalQuality of Life Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectpsychological assessmenten_US
dc.subjectwell-beingen_US
dc.subjectpositive affecten_US
dc.subjectlife satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectmeaningen_US
dc.titleAssessing Psychological Well-Being: Self-Report Instruments for the NIH Toolboxen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms494342.pdf
Size:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: