Using a "Kickoff" to build implementation partner teams and action plans for active implementation of a quality improvement project
dc.contributor.author | Baird, Sean A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Damush, Teresa M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rattray, Nicholas A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Penney, Lauren S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Miech, Edward J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Homoya, Barbara J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferguson, Jared | |
dc.contributor.author | Myers, Laura J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bravata, Dawn M. | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-15T12:53:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-15T12:53:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-06-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: A strategy for transitioning implementation successfully from pre-implementation to active implementation is to hold a team "kickoff." The objectives of this manuscript are: (1) to present the frameworks that guided the development of the Protocol-guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient neurological symptoms (PREVENT) kickoff strategy, (2) describe design elements of the kickoff and how they contribute to achieving PREVENT kickoff aims; forming teams, developing an action plan, and launching active implementation (3) examine the perceived usefulness of those kickoff design elements toward achieving kickoff aims. Methods: PREVENT was a stepped-wedge trial to improve the quality of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) care at six Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. The PREVENT kickoff was designed from multiple frameworks: theory of change principles for process improvement; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); social learning models; and systems redesign. Data collected included pre-kickoff planning documents and post-kickoff debriefs from the PREVENT national team, Audience Response System (ARS) data, post-kickoff site participant evaluations and semi-structured interviews. Results: Site team participants reflected positively on the framework driven, interactive and interpersonal design elements, team building, and action plan exercises, and found them useful for a successful project launch. In-person and hybrid set-up of the kickoff, interactive elements, and team formation activities emphasized the quality problem, and motivated site implementation providers to plan for stroke/TIA care improvement. Conclusions: Implementation team kickoffs during pre-implementation are a useful approach to inform and engage local clinical teams and to form plans for practice changes to improve clinical care. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Baird SA, Damush TM, Rattray NA, et al. Using a "Kickoff" to build implementation partner teams and action plans for active implementation of a quality improvement project. Front Health Serv. 2025;5:1580653. Published 2025 Jun 10. doi:10.3389/frhs.2025.1580653 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/49478 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3389/frhs.2025.1580653 | |
dc.relation.journal | Frontiers in Health Services | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Action plan | |
dc.subject | Implementation strategies | |
dc.subject | Kickoff | |
dc.subject | Quality improvement | |
dc.subject | Team | |
dc.title | Using a "Kickoff" to build implementation partner teams and action plans for active implementation of a quality improvement project | |
dc.type | Article |