Direct Analysis of Aerosolized Chemical Warfare Simulants Captured on a Modified Glass-Based Substrate by “Paper-Spray” Ionization

dc.contributor.authorDhummakupt, Elizabeth S.
dc.contributor.authorMach, Phillip M.
dc.contributor.authorCarmany, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDemond, Paul S.
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Theodore S.
dc.contributor.authorConnell, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorWylie, Harold S.
dc.contributor.authorManicke, Nicholas E.
dc.contributor.authorNilles, J. Michael
dc.contributor.authorGlaros, Trevor
dc.contributor.departmentChemistry and Chemical Biology, School of Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-30T18:15:54Z
dc.date.available2018-05-30T18:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.description.abstractPaper spray ionization mass spectrometry offers a rapid alternative platform requiring no sample preparation. Aerosolized chemical warfare agent (CWA) simulants trimethyl phosphate, dimethyl methylphosphonate, and diisopropyl methylphosphonate were captured by passing air through a glass fiber filter disk within a disposable paper spray cartridge. CWA simulants were aerosolized at varying concentrations using an in-house built aerosol chamber. A custom 3D-printed holder was designed and built to facilitate the aerosol capture onto the paper spray cartridges. The air flow through each of the collection devices was maintained equally to ensure the same volume of air sampled across methods. Each approach yielded linear calibration curves with R2 values between 0.98–0.99 for each compound and similar limits of detection in terms of disbursed aerosol concentration. While the glass fiber filter disk has a higher capture efficiency (≈40%), the paper spray method produces analogous results even with a lower capture efficiency (≈1%). Improvements were made to include glass fiber filters as the substrate within the paper spray cartridge consumable. Glass fiber filters were then treated with ammonium sulfate to decrease chemical interaction with the simulants. This allowed for improved direct aerosol capture efficiency (>40%). Ultimately, the limits of detection were reduced to levels comparable to current worker population limits of 1 × 10–6 mg/m3.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationDhummakupt, E. S., Mach, P. M., Carmany, D., Demond, P. S., Moran, T. S., Connell, T., … Glaros, T. (2017). Direct Analysis of Aerosolized Chemical Warfare Simulants Captured on a Modified Glass-Based Substrate by “Paper-Spray” Ionization. Analytical Chemistry, 89(20), 10866–10872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02530en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/16297
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherACSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02530en_US
dc.relation.journalAnalytical Chemistryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectpaper spray ionization mass spectrometryen_US
dc.subjectchemical warfare agentsen_US
dc.subjectaerosol capture efficiencyen_US
dc.titleDirect Analysis of Aerosolized Chemical Warfare Simulants Captured on a Modified Glass-Based Substrate by “Paper-Spray” Ionizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dhummakupt_2017_direct.pdf
Size:
1.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: