Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorSwiezy, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorMcKinzie, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorKomanapalli, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorBernard, Caitlin
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-28T15:54:51Z
dc.date.available2023-04-28T15:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Evaluate a Midwestern medical school's current pregnancy termination and family planning undergraduate medical curriculum (UMC) in accordance with Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) guidelines. Assess 1) student interest 2) preparedness to counsel patients, and 3) preferred modality of instruction. STUDY DESIGN: A survey assessed students about UMC. Course syllabus learning objectives and APGO educational guidelines were compared. RESULTS: There were 309 responses total; six did not complete all survey questions and were excluded. Participants (n = 303) were primarily female (62%) and White (74%). Across all class levels, many (61%) students expected to learn about family planning and contraception in UMC. While most (84-88%) participants who completed the preclinical course with or without the clerkship felt prepared to counsel about common, non-controversial pharmacotherapies, only 20% of students felt prepared to counsel on abortion options, and 75% of students who had completed both the preclinical and OBGYN clerkship felt unprepared for abortion counseling Overall, 86% of all students surveyed believed that the medical school should enhance its reproductive health coverage in UMC. Traditional lectures, panels, and direct clinical exposure were the most popular instructional modalities. CONCLUSION: We identified potential gaps in UMC where students expressed high level of interest with low level of preparedness regarding abortion options counseling, even among senior students. Considering the high percentage of students expecting to learn about pregnancy termination and family planning in their UMC, this expectation is not being met. Students were open to a variety of modalities of instruction, indicating that several possible options exist for curricular integration. IMPLICATIONS: Despite evidence of need for training in family planning and abortion, few medical institutions have a standardized curriculum. Little available literature exists on curricula covering pregnancy options and contraception counseling, signifying a gap of knowledge and an opportunity to study how to integrate these important topics into UMC.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrown L, Swiezy S, McKinzie A, Komanapalli S, Bernard C. Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school. Heliyon. 2022 Jul 1;8(7):e09894. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09894en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32697
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09894en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAbortionen_US
dc.subjectContraceptive counselingen_US
dc.subjectMedical educationen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy options counselingen_US
dc.subjectUndergraduate medical curriculumen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical schoolen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brown et al.pdf
Size:
626.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: