Human Sexuality and Health Scholarly Concentration works
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Sexual Communication Self-Efficacy and PrEP Literacy Helps to Meet HIV Prevention Outcomes Among Black and Latinx Individuals(Sage Journals, 2022) Carter, Gregory; Brown, Lucy; Mahnke, Brianna; Ohmit, Anita; Woodward, BrennanBackground: Ending the HIV Epidemic is a campaign dedicated to reducing new HIV infections in the United States by 90% by 2030. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) holds significant promise as a prevention tool. However, uptake has not improved much since then. As a result, this research looked at how PrEP literacy relates to sexual communication self-efficacy. Methods: Between August 4 and 21, 2020, we performed a community-informed cross-sectional study of Black and Latino residents in Indiana. We collected demographic information as well as PrEP literacy, sexual communication self-efficacy, and awareness of HIV status. Results: Being unaware of one's own HIV status and being unsure of one's sexual identity were both linked to reduced self-efficacy in the domain of sex communication. Those who had a greater level of PrEP literacy felt more confident in their ability to communicate with others about sexually related topics. People living in rural areas showed a significantly lower degree of sexual communication self-efficacy than participants in urban settings. Conclusion: Providing information about PrEP to those at risk of acquiring the virus may help them connect with treatment or prevention services. Healthcare professionals should take the time to understand their patients' levels of PrEP literacy and communication self-efficacy regarding sexual health.Item American Singles’ Attitudes Toward Future Romantic/ Sexual Partners’ COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Evidence for both Vigilance and Indifference in a National Sample(Springer, 2023-05-18) Campbell, Jessica T.; Bennett-Brown, Magaret; Marcotte, Alexandra S.; Kaufman, Ellen M.; Moscovici, Zoe; Adams, Olivia R.; Lovins, Sydney; Garcia, Justin R.; Gesselman, Amanda N.Around 142 million American adults are currently single; at least half of these singles want to pursue a romantic partner. Romantic dating can involve exposure to numerous people. Thus, dating can significantly impact pathogen exposure risk. In a demographically-representative cross-sectional survey conducted in 2021 (N = 5,000), we examined U.S. American singles' COVID-19 vaccination status, assessed their preferences around a potential partner's COVID-19 vaccination status, and identified demographic subgroups of singles particularly opposed to or indifferent to a partner being vaccinated against COVID-19. Our results showed 65% of participants were fully vaccinated, 10% were partially vaccinated, and 26% were unvaccinated against COVID-19. With regards to partner preferences, half wanted a vaccinated partner; 18.9% wanted a vaccinated partner but would make exceptions; 6.1% wanted an unvaccinated partner; and 25% reported that they did not care about their dating partner's vaccination status. Partner preferences were largely aligned with participants' own vaccination status, such that vaccinated participants preferred vaccinated partners. However, those preferring unvaccinated partners-or those willing to make exceptions for a partner-were most likely to identify as men, younger in age, a political affiliation outside of the two-party political system, a gender or sexual minority, or as a racial minority (i.e., Black/African-American or South Asian). Additionally, participants who were employed (vs. unemployed) were more likely to make exceptions for or prefer an unvaccinated partner. These results suggest that singles prefer homophily in COVID-19 vaccine status, and that minoritized subgroups of singles are more likely to maintain a social network including unvaccinated close others.Item They “Don't Know How to Deal with People Like Me”: Assessing Health Care Experiences of Gender Minorities in Indiana(Mary Ann Liebert, 2022-10-07) Newsom, Keeley D.; Riddle, Michael J.; Carter, Gregory A.; Hille, Jessica J.; Graduate Medical Education, School of MedicinePurpose: Within the LGBTQ+ community, the transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) population experience a disproportionate amount of discrimination when seeking health care. Such disparities may arise from lack of proper medical training and resources for providers or biases. In this study, we examine the health care experiences of TGNB individuals living in Southern Indiana. Methods: We analyzed responses from TGNB respondents to an LGBTQ+ health care needs assessment survey in Southern Indiana. Respondents were asked about demographic data, their self-assessed health status, quality of health care received, whether they have a provider with whom they feel comfortable sharing their gender identity with, and if they have to commute to see their provider. Finally, respondents were asked an open-ended question about their health care experiences while living in Southern Indiana. Responses were coded and several themes emerged and were analyzed. Results: Eighty-five TGNB individuals completed our survey. Less than half of respondents indicated that they had an LGBTQ+-welcoming provider (44.7%). Individuals with an LGBTQ+-welcoming provider were more likely to report their self-assessed health as excellent/good (p=0.02) and quality of health as excellent/very good (p=0.03) compared to individuals without an LGBTQ+-welcoming provider. Five themes emerged from the write-in responses (n=64): discrimination (34.4%), invalidation (32.8%), distrust (28.1%), logistic concerns (35.9%), and positive experiences (35.9%). Conclusion: The TGNB community living in Southern Indiana reports numerous barriers related to provider attitudes when obtaining health care. Additional training is needed to address provider biases and improve LGBTQ+ community health disparities.Item Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school(Elsevier, 2022) Brown, Lucy; Swiezy, Sarah; McKinzie, Alexandra; Komanapalli, Sarah; Bernard, CaitlinOBJECTIVE: Evaluate a Midwestern medical school's current pregnancy termination and family planning undergraduate medical curriculum (UMC) in accordance with Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) guidelines. Assess 1) student interest 2) preparedness to counsel patients, and 3) preferred modality of instruction. STUDY DESIGN: A survey assessed students about UMC. Course syllabus learning objectives and APGO educational guidelines were compared. RESULTS: There were 309 responses total; six did not complete all survey questions and were excluded. Participants (n = 303) were primarily female (62%) and White (74%). Across all class levels, many (61%) students expected to learn about family planning and contraception in UMC. While most (84-88%) participants who completed the preclinical course with or without the clerkship felt prepared to counsel about common, non-controversial pharmacotherapies, only 20% of students felt prepared to counsel on abortion options, and 75% of students who had completed both the preclinical and OBGYN clerkship felt unprepared for abortion counseling Overall, 86% of all students surveyed believed that the medical school should enhance its reproductive health coverage in UMC. Traditional lectures, panels, and direct clinical exposure were the most popular instructional modalities. CONCLUSION: We identified potential gaps in UMC where students expressed high level of interest with low level of preparedness regarding abortion options counseling, even among senior students. Considering the high percentage of students expecting to learn about pregnancy termination and family planning in their UMC, this expectation is not being met. Students were open to a variety of modalities of instruction, indicating that several possible options exist for curricular integration. IMPLICATIONS: Despite evidence of need for training in family planning and abortion, few medical institutions have a standardized curriculum. Little available literature exists on curricula covering pregnancy options and contraception counseling, signifying a gap of knowledge and an opportunity to study how to integrate these important topics into UMC.