The impact of mouth rinses on the efficacy of fluoride dentifrices in preventing enamel and dentin erosion/abrasion

dc.contributor.authorAlbeshir, Ebtehal G.
dc.contributor.authorAlbluwi, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorAlmubarak, Ibtisam K.
dc.contributor.authorAlrabea, Abdulmohsen
dc.contributor.authorCook, Norman B.
dc.contributor.authorEckert, George J.
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson T.
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank
dc.contributor.departmentBiomedical and Applied Sciences, School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-02T20:00:45Z
dc.date.available2025-05-02T20:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-11
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Toothbrushing followed by is a method to maintain good oral hygiene. It is unknown to what extent mouth rinses can modulate the effect of fluoride in its ability to prevent erosion/abrasion. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the impact of chlorhexidine (CHX), essential oils (EO), and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinses on erosive tooth wear protection afforded by conventional fluoride toothpaste. Methodology: The following experimental factors were considered: Five rinses: CHX, EO, CPC, a fluoride rinse, and water, two fluoride toothpaste: stannous fluoride (SnF2), sodium fluoride (NaF), and two models: erosion only and erosion + abrasion. Bovine enamel and dentin slabs were embedded in resin blocks (n=8). Specimens were subjected to a five-day cycling regimen consisting of twicedaily treatments, with or without abrasion, with fluoride toothpaste, followed by mouth rinse exposure. Erosion (0.3% citric acid) was performed 5×/d. Specimens were exposed to artificial saliva during remineralization periods. Surface loss (SL) was determined using non-contact profilometry. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (=0.05). Results: There was no interaction among the three factors (type of toothpaste, mouth rinse, and abrasion or not). There were no significant two-way interactions, as SL was only affected by toothpaste and mouth rinse. NaF caused less SL than SnF2 (p<0.0001) in dentin, whereas the opposite was found in enamel (p<0.0001). Erosion + abrasion caused more SL than erosion only (p<0.0001). None of the tested mouth rinses affected SL. Conclusion: Commonly used mouth rinses do not impair the erosion/abrasion protection fluoride toothpaste provides.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationAlbeshir, E. G., Albluwi, R. A., Almubarak, I. K., Alrabea, A., Cook, N. B., Eckert, G. J., Hara, A. T., & Lippert, F. (2023). The impact of mouth rinses on the efficacy of fluoride dentifrices in preventing enamel and dentin erosion/abrasion. Medical Science, 27(141), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi.v27i141.e378ms3251
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/47667
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDiscovery Scientific Society
dc.relation.isversionof10.54905/disssi.v27i141.e378ms3251
dc.relation.journalMedical Science
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePublisher
dc.subjectdental erosion
dc.subjectabrasion
dc.subjectfluoride
dc.titleThe impact of mouth rinses on the efficacy of fluoride dentifrices in preventing enamel and dentin erosion/abrasion
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Albeshir2023TheImpact-CCBY.pdf
Size:
643.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: