Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols

dc.contributor.authorMorton, Dean
dc.contributor.authorWismeijer, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorChen, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Adam
dc.contributor.authorWittneben, Julia
dc.contributor.authorCasentini, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorGonzaga, Luiz
dc.contributor.authorLazarin, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMartin, William
dc.contributor.authorMolinero-Mourelle, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorObermailer, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorPolido, Waldemar D.
dc.contributor.authorTahmaseb, Ali
dc.contributor.authorThoma, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorZembic, Anja
dc.contributor.departmentProsthodontics, School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T19:08:44Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T19:08:44Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.description.abstractObjectives Working Group 5 was convened to discuss and find consensus on the topics of implant placement and loading protocols associated with single missing teeth in the anterior maxilla (aesthetic zone). Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions were developed and presented to the plenary for discussion and approval. Materials and Methods Two systematic reviews were developed and submitted prior to the conference. The group considered in detail the systematic reviews and developed statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions based on the findings of the reviews and experience of group members. Definitive versions were developed after presentation to and discussion by the plenary. Results Five consensus statements were developed and approved from each systematic review. Twelve clinical recommendations were developed by the group based on both reviews and experience. Three patient perspectives were developed, and five suggestions made for future research. Conclusions Based on the findings of the systematic reviews and experience of group members, the Type 1A protocol (immediate placement and immediate loading), when utilized in the anterior maxilla under favorable conditions, is considered predictable and is associated with high survival rates. The procedure is considered clinically viable and is associated with aesthetic outcomes, although surgical, technical, and biological complications can occur.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationMorton, D., Wismeijer, D., Chen, S., Hamilton, A., Wittneben, J., Casentini, P., Gonzaga, L., Lazarin, R., Martin, W., Molinero-Mourelle, P., Obermailer, B., Polido, W. D., Tahmaseb, A., Thoma, D., & Zembic, A. (2023). Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34 Suppl 26, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14137
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/44751
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/clr.14137
dc.relation.journalClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcePublisher
dc.subjectbone implant interactions
dc.subjectclinical assessment
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.titleGroup 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Morton2023Group5-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
671.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: