Comparative Analysis of AML Classification Systems: Evaluating the WHO, ICC, and ELN Frameworks and Their Distinctions
dc.contributor.author | Salman, Huda | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-11T09:20:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-11T09:20:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | Comprehensive analyses of the molecular heterogeneity of acute myelogenous leukemia, AML, particularly when malignant cells retain normal karyotype, has significantly evolved. In 2022, significant revisions were introduced in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 guidelines of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These revisions coincided with the inception of the first version of the International Consensus Classification (ICC) for AML. These modifications aim to improve diagnosis and treatment outcomes via a comprehensive incorporation of sophisticated genetic and clinical parameters as well as facilitate accruals to innovative clinical trials. Key updates include modifications to the blast count criteria for AML diagnosis, with WHO 2022 eliminating the ≥20% blast requirement in the presence of AML-defining abnormalities and ICC 2022 setting a 10% cutoff for recurrent genetic abnormalities. Additionally, new categories, such as AML with mutated TP53 and MDS/AML, were introduced. ELN 2022 guidelines retained risk stratification approach and emphasized the critical role of measurable residual disease (MRD) that increased the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and flow cytometry testing. These revisions underscore the importance of precise classification for targeted treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. How much difference versus concordance these classifications present and the impact of those on clinical practice is a continuing discussion. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Salman H. Comparative Analysis of AML Classification Systems: Evaluating the WHO, ICC, and ELN Frameworks and Their Distinctions. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(16):2915. Published 2024 Aug 22. doi:10.3390/cancers16162915 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/43891 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | MDPI | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3390/cancers16162915 | |
dc.relation.journal | Cancers | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Acute myeloid leukemia | |
dc.subject | Classification | |
dc.subject | European LeukemiaNet (ELN) | |
dc.subject | World Health Organization (WHO) | |
dc.title | Comparative Analysis of AML Classification Systems: Evaluating the WHO, ICC, and ELN Frameworks and Their Distinctions | |
dc.type | Article |