Association between social vulnerability index and admission urgency for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

dc.contributor.authorBolakale-Rufai, Ikeoluwapo Kendra
dc.contributor.authorShinnerl, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, Shannon M.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Amber E.
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, Selma
dc.contributor.authorBrewer, LaPrincess
dc.contributor.authorTorabi, Asad
dc.contributor.authorAddison, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMazimba, Sula
dc.contributor.authorBreathett, Khadijah
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T13:16:33Z
dc.date.available2024-06-24T13:16:33Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not offered equitably to vulnerable population groups. Adequate levels of insurance may narrow gaps among patients with higher social vulnerability index (SVI). Among a national population of individuals with commercial or Medicare insurance, we sought to determine whether SVI was associated with urgency of receipt of TAVR for aortic stenosis. Methods and results: Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (CDM), we identified admissions for TAVR with aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2022. Admission urgency was identified by CDM claims codes. SVI was cross-referenced to patient zip codes and grouped into quintiles. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to predict the probability of a TAVR admission being urgent based on SVI quintiles, adjusting for patient and hospital-level covariates. Results: Among 6680 admissions for TAVR [median age 80 years (interquartile range 75-85), 43.9 % female], 8.5 % (n = 567) were classified as urgent. After adjusting for patient and hospital-level variables, there were no significant differences in the odds of urgent admission for TAVR according to SVI quintiles [OR 5th (greatest social vulnerability) vs 1st quintile (least social vulnerability): 1.29 (95 % CI: 0.90-1.85)]. Conclusions: Among commercial or Medicare beneficiaries with aortic stenosis, SVI was not associated with admission urgency for TAVR. To clarify whether cardiovascular care delivery is improved across SVI with higher paying beneficiaries, future investigation should identify whether relationships between SVI and TAVR urgency vary for Medicaid beneficiaries compared to commercial beneficiaries.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationBolakale-Rufai IK, Shinnerl A, Knapp SM, et al. Association between social vulnerability index and admission urgency for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J Plus. 2024;39:100370. doi:10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100370
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/41807
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100370
dc.relation.journalAmerican Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectSocial determinants of health
dc.subjectSocial vulnerability index
dc.subjectValve surgery
dc.subjectEmergency
dc.subjectValve replacement
dc.subjectAortic stenosis
dc.subjectHealthcare delivery
dc.titleAssociation between social vulnerability index and admission urgency for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BolakaleRufai2024Association-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
703.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: