Korsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument

dc.contributor.authorKahn, Samuel
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophy, School of Liberal Arts
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-28T20:50:54Z
dc.date.available2025-02-28T20:50:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.description.abstractIn this discussion note, I aim to reconstruct and assess Korsgaard's recent attempt to extend her regress argument. I begin, in section 1, with a brief recapitulation of the regress argument. Then, in section 2, I turn to the extension. I argue that the extension does not work because Korsgaard cannot rule out the possibility--a possibility for which there is both empirical evidence and argumentative pressure coming directly from the original regress--that we value animality in ourselves qua animality of rational beings.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationKahn, S. (2023). Korsgaard’s Expanded Regress Argument. Manuscrito, 46, 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.V46N2.SK
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/46138
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSciELO
dc.relation.isversionof10.1590/0100-6045.2023.V46N2.SK
dc.relation.journalManuscrito
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePublisher
dc.subjectKorsgaard
dc.subjectKant
dc.subjectformula of humanity
dc.titleKorsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kahn2023Korsgaard-CCBY.pdf
Size:
428.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: