Use of medical, surgical and complementary treatments among women with fibroids

dc.contributor.authorJacoby, Vanessa L.
dc.contributor.authorJacoby, Alison
dc.contributor.authorLearman, Lee A.
dc.contributor.authorSchembri, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGregorich, Steven E.
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorKuppermann, Miriam
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-02T16:00:17Z
dc.date.available2016-11-02T16:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2014-11
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To examine the use of medical management, uterus-preserving surgery (UPS), and complementary treatments among women with uterine fibroids. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of 933 premenopausal women ages 31-54 years with symptomatic fibroids who participated in the Study of Pelvic Problems, Hysterectomy, and Intervention Alternatives (SOPHIA) for an average of 4.3 years (SD 2.5 years). Incident use of fibroid treatments was determined through annual interviews. Linear regression models were used to compare changes in fibroid-related symptoms among women who underwent UPS versus those who did not undergo surgery. RESULTS: Participants were racially and ethnically diverse, with a mean age of 43 years. During study follow-up, 531 participants (57%) did not undergo UPS or hysterectomy, 250 (27%) had at least one UPS, and 152 (16%) underwent hysterectomy. Complementary and alternative treatments were commonly used, including exercise (45%), diet (34%), herbs (37%), and acupuncture (16%): participants reported significant symptom improvement and few side effects with these interventions. In multivariable linear regression models, women who did not undergo surgery during the study reported improvement in dyspareunia (p<.001), pelvic pain (p<.001), and menstrual cramps (p<.001). However, women who underwent UPS reported greater overall resolution of "pelvic problems" compared with women who did not have surgical treatment (difference in change score 1.18 on a four-point Likert scale, p<.001). CONCLUSION: UPS are effective treatments for women with fibroids, but many women use hormonal or complementary treatments and report significant symptom improvement without surgical intervention.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationJacoby, V. L., Jacoby, A., Learman, L. A., Schembri, M., Gregorich, S. E., Jackson, R., & Kuppermann, M. (2014). Use of medical, surgical and complementary treatments among women with fibroids. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 182, 220–225. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.004en_US
dc.identifier.issn1872-7654en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11317
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.004en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectLeiomyomaen_US
dc.subjecttherapyen_US
dc.subjectOrgan Sparing Treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectUterine Neoplasmsen_US
dc.titleUse of medical, surgical and complementary treatments among women with fibroidsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms730045.pdf
Size:
213.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: