Effect of Lesion Baseline Severity and Mineral Distribution on Remineralization and Progression of Human and Bovine Dentin Caries Lesions

dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank
dc.contributor.authorChurchley, David
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Richard J.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-18T14:49:05Z
dc.date.available2017-08-18T14:49:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this laboratory study were to compare the effects of lesion baseline severity, mineral distribution and substrate on remineralization and progression of caries lesions created in root dentin. Lesions were formed in dentin specimens prepared from human and bovine dentin using three protocols, each utilizing three demineralization periods to create lesions of different mineral distributions (subsurface, moderate softening, extreme softening) and severity within each lesion type. Lesions were then either remineralized or demineralized further and analyzed using transverse microradiography. At lesion baseline, no differences were found between human and bovine dentin for integrated mineral loss (ΔZ). Differences in mineral distribution between lesion types were apparent. Human dentin lesions were more prone to secondary demineralization (ΔΔZ) than bovine dentin lesions, although there were no differences in ΔL. Likewise, smaller lesions were more susceptible to secondary demineralization than larger ones. Subsurface lesions were more acid-resistant than moderately and extremely softened lesions. After remineralization, differences between human and bovine dentin lesions were not apparent for ΔΔZ although bovine dentin lesions showed greater reduction in lesion depth L. For lesion types, responsiveness to remineralization (ΔΔZ) was in the order extremely softened > moderately softened > subsurface. More demineralized lesions exhibited greater remineralization than shallower ones. In summary, some differences exist between human and bovine dentin and their relative responsiveness to de- and remineralization. These differences, however, were overshadowed by the effects of lesion baseline mineral distribution and severity. Thus, bovine dentin appears to be a suitable substitute for human dentin in mechanistic root caries studies.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLippert, F., Churchley, D., & Lynch, R. J. (2015). Effect of lesion baseline severity and mineral distribution on remineralization and progression of human and bovine dentin caries lesions. Caries research, 49(5), 467-476.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/13862
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1159/000431039en_US
dc.relation.journalCaries Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectbovine dentinen_US
dc.subjectcaries lesionen_US
dc.subjectdemineralizationen_US
dc.titleEffect of Lesion Baseline Severity and Mineral Distribution on Remineralization and Progression of Human and Bovine Dentin Caries Lesionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Lippert_2015_effect.pdf
Size:
627.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: