Full Training versus Fine Tuning for Radiology Images Concept Detection Task for the ImageCLEF 2019 Challenge

If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2019
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract

Concept detection from medical images remains a challenging task that limits implementation of clinical ML/AI pipelines because of the scarcity of the highly trained experts to annotate images. There is a need for automated processes that can extract concrete textual information from image data. ImageCLEF 2019 provided us a set of images with labels as UMLS concepts. We participated for the rst time for the concept detection task using transfer learning. Our approach involved an experiment of layerwise ne tuning (full training) versus ne tuning based on previous reported recommendations for training classi cation, detection and segmentation tasks for medical imaging. We ranked number 9 in this year's challenge, with an F1 result of 0.05 after three entries. We had a poor result from performing layerwise tuning (F1 score of 0.014) which is consistent with previous authors who have described the bene t of full training for transfer learning. However when looking at the results by a radiologist, the terms do not make clinical sense and we hypothesize that we can achieve better performance when using medical pretrained image models for example PathNet and utilizing a hierarchical training approach which is the basis of our future work on this dataset.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Sinha, P., Purkayastha, S., & Gichoya, J. (2019). Full Training versus Fine Tuning for Radiology Images Concept Detection Task for the ImageCLEF 2019 Challenge. In CLEF (Working Notes), 8.
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
CLEF Working Notes
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}