Electrostatic repulsion causes anticooperative DNA binding between tumor suppressor ETS transcription factors and JUN-FOS at composite DNA sites
dc.contributor.author | Madison, Bethany J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Clark, Kathleen A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bhachech, Niraja | |
dc.contributor.author | Hollenhorst, Peter C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Graves, Barbara J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Currie, Simon L. | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-06T15:37:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-06T15:37:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11-30 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many different transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression in a combinatorial fashion, often by binding in close proximity to each other on composite cis-regulatory DNA elements. Here, we investigated how ETS TFs bind with the AP1 TFs JUN-FOS at composite DNA-binding sites. DNA-binding ability with JUN-FOS correlated with the phenotype of ETS proteins in prostate cancer. We found that the oncogenic ETS-related gene (ERG) and ETS variant (ETV) 1/4/5 subfamilies co-occupy ETS-AP1 sites with JUN-FOS in vitro, whereas JUN-FOS robustly inhibited DNA binding by the tumor suppressors ETS homologous factor (EHF) and SAM pointed domain-containing ETS TF (SPDEF). EHF bound ETS-AP1 DNA with tighter affinity than ERG in the absence of JUN-FOS, possibly enabling EHF to compete with ERG and JUN-FOS for binding to ETS-AP1 sites. Genome-wide mapping of EHF- and ERG-binding sites in prostate epithelial cells revealed that EHF is preferentially excluded from closely spaced ETS-AP1 DNA sequences. Structural modeling and mutational analyses indicated that adjacent positively charged surfaces from EHF and JUN-FOS use electrostatic repulsion to disfavor simultaneous DNA binding. Conservation of positive residues on the JUN-FOS interface identified E74-like ETS TF 1 (ELF1) as an additional ETS TF exhibiting anticooperative DNA binding with JUN-FOS, and we found that ELF1 is frequently down-regulated in prostate cancer. In summary, divergent electrostatic features of ETS TFs at their JUN-FOS interface enable distinct binding events at ETS-AP1 DNA sites, which may drive specific targeting of ETS TFs to facilitate distinct transcriptional programs. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Madison, B. J., Clark, K. A., Bhachech, N., Hollenhorst, P. C., Graves, B. J., & Currie, S. L. (2018). Electrostatic repulsion causes anticooperative DNA binding between tumor suppressor ETS transcription factors and JUN-FOS at composite DNA sites. The Journal of biological chemistry, 293(48), 18624–18635. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA118.003352 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/21745 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003352 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | The Journal of Biological Chemistry | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | AP1 transcription factor (AP1) | en_US |
dc.subject | ETS transcription factor family | en_US |
dc.subject | Gene expression | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Protein–DNA interaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Protein–protein interaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Tumor suppressor gene | en_US |
dc.subject | JUN–FOS complex | en_US |
dc.subject | Transcriptional regulation | en_US |
dc.title | Electrostatic repulsion causes anticooperative DNA binding between tumor suppressor ETS transcription factors and JUN-FOS at composite DNA sites | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |