Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test

dc.contributor.authorChristy, Shannon M.
dc.contributor.authorMonahan, Patrick O.
dc.contributor.authorStump, Timothy E.
dc.contributor.authorRawl, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorChampion, Victoria L.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychology, School of Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-27T16:23:54Z
dc.date.available2020-02-27T16:23:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.description.abstractBackground. Individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) have multiple test options. Preference for a specific test modality may affect decision making about CRC screening. The current study examined 1) the sociodemographic and health belief characteristics of average-risk participants with a test preference for stool blood test (SBT) versus those with a preference of colonoscopy, and following receipt of a tailored CRC screening intervention, 2) the percentage of participants who completed a preference-concordant CRC screening test, and 3) the sociodemographic, health care experience, and health belief characteristics and intervention group(s) associated with completion of a preference-concordant screening test. Methods. Participants (N = 603) were female, aged 50 to 75 years, at average CRC risk, not currently up-to-date with CRC screening recommendations, had Internet access, and were randomized to receive 1 of 3 tailored CRC screening promotion interventions. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results. Most women (64%) preferred SBT, whereas 36% preferred colonoscopy. There were significant differences in test preference by age, stage of change for the specific tests, perceived benefits of CRC screening, perceived barriers to both tests, and self-efficacy for colonoscopy. Two hundred thirty participants completed CRC screening at 6 months post-intervention. Of those, most (84%) completed a test concordant with their preference. Multivariable analyses revealed that compared with participants completing a preference-discordant test, those completing a preference-concordant test were older (P = 0.01), had health insurance (P < 0.05), and were in the phone counseling-only group (P < 0.01). Conclusions. High levels of completion of preference-concordant CRC screening can be achieved by educating average-risk patients about the multiple screening test options, soliciting their preferences, and offering testing that is concordant with their preference.en_US
dc.identifier.citationChristy, S. M., Monahan, P. O., Stump, T. E., Rawl, S. M., & Champion, V. L. (2019). Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test. Medical Decision Making, 40(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19890603en_US
dc.identifier.issn0272-989Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22168
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0272989X19890603en_US
dc.relation.journalMedical Decision Makingen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectColorectal Cancer Screening Test
dc.subjectColorectal cancer
dc.subjectStool blood test
dc.subjectTailored Colorectal cancer screening intervention
dc.titleImpact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Testen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1541875.pdf
Size:
422.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's Manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: