Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test
dc.contributor.author | Christy, Shannon M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Monahan, Patrick O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stump, Timothy E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rawl, Susan M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Champion, Victoria L. | |
dc.contributor.department | Psychology, School of Science | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-27T16:23:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-27T16:23:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background. Individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) have multiple test options. Preference for a specific test modality may affect decision making about CRC screening. The current study examined 1) the sociodemographic and health belief characteristics of average-risk participants with a test preference for stool blood test (SBT) versus those with a preference of colonoscopy, and following receipt of a tailored CRC screening intervention, 2) the percentage of participants who completed a preference-concordant CRC screening test, and 3) the sociodemographic, health care experience, and health belief characteristics and intervention group(s) associated with completion of a preference-concordant screening test. Methods. Participants (N = 603) were female, aged 50 to 75 years, at average CRC risk, not currently up-to-date with CRC screening recommendations, had Internet access, and were randomized to receive 1 of 3 tailored CRC screening promotion interventions. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results. Most women (64%) preferred SBT, whereas 36% preferred colonoscopy. There were significant differences in test preference by age, stage of change for the specific tests, perceived benefits of CRC screening, perceived barriers to both tests, and self-efficacy for colonoscopy. Two hundred thirty participants completed CRC screening at 6 months post-intervention. Of those, most (84%) completed a test concordant with their preference. Multivariable analyses revealed that compared with participants completing a preference-discordant test, those completing a preference-concordant test were older (P = 0.01), had health insurance (P < 0.05), and were in the phone counseling-only group (P < 0.01). Conclusions. High levels of completion of preference-concordant CRC screening can be achieved by educating average-risk patients about the multiple screening test options, soliciting their preferences, and offering testing that is concordant with their preference. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Christy, S. M., Monahan, P. O., Stump, T. E., Rawl, S. M., & Champion, V. L. (2019). Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test. Medical Decision Making, 40(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19890603 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0272-989X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/22168 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1177/0272989X19890603 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Medical Decision Making | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | Colorectal Cancer Screening Test | |
dc.subject | Colorectal cancer | |
dc.subject | Stool blood test | |
dc.subject | Tailored Colorectal cancer screening intervention | |
dc.title | Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- nihms-1541875.pdf
- Size:
- 422.65 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Author's Manuscript
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.99 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: