Increasing Anteroposterior Genital Hiatus Widening Does Not Limit Apical Descent for Prolapse Staging during Valsalva’s Maneuver: Effect on Symptom Severity and Surgical Decision Making

dc.contributor.authorGuanzon, Anna
dc.contributor.authorHeit, Michael
dc.contributor.authorKhoder, Waseem
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-28T17:09:00Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T17:09:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.description.abstractObjective: Determine if anteroposterior genital hiatus (GH) widening obscures rather than facilitates signs and symptoms, inadvertently altering management decisions for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) during Valsalva's Maneuver, at a given total vaginal length (TVL). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort with nested cross-sectional study of patients who underwent POP surgery. Data from obstetric and gynecologic history, preoperative and postoperative physical examinations, and 20-item Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and 7-item Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) scores were extracted. Study participants were compared in 2 groups: anteroposterior widened (>3 cm) and not widened (<=3 cm) GH, for baseline leading edge and POP stage, while controlling for TVL. Baseline PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores were evaluated within GH groups. Delta GH, PFDI-20, and PFIQ-7 scores after apical suspension with and without posterior colporrhaphy were compared to assess the clinical value of the procedure. Results: Study participants with anteroposterior GH widening during Valsalva maneuver had greater baseline leading edge descent and higher POP stage compared with those without anteroposterior GH widening after controlling for TVL. Baseline PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores were similar within both GH categories controlling for prolapse severity. Adding posterior colporrhaphy to apical suspension resulted in a greater anteroposterior GH reduction without improving delta PFDI-20 or PFIQ-7 scores. Conclusions: Facilitation through herniation rather than obscuration from anteroposterior GH widening explains why patients will not be undertreated based on signs and symptoms of disease. Adding posterior colporrhaphy to apical suspension more effectively reduces anteroposterior GH widening without differential improvement in symptoms rendering the operation to no more than a cosmetic procedure.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationGuanzon, A., Heit, M., & Khoder, W. (2018). Increasing Anteroposterior Genital Hiatus Widening Does Not Limit Apical Descent for Prolapse Staging During Valsalva's Maneuver: Effect on Symptom Severity and Surgical Decision Making. Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery, 24(6), 412-418.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/19752
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SPV.0000000000000474en_US
dc.relation.journalFemale Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectgenital hiatusen_US
dc.subjectposterior colporrhaphyen_US
dc.subjectmesh augmented apical suspensionen_US
dc.titleIncreasing Anteroposterior Genital Hiatus Widening Does Not Limit Apical Descent for Prolapse Staging during Valsalva’s Maneuver: Effect on Symptom Severity and Surgical Decision Makingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Guanzon_2018_increasing.pdf
Size:
304.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: