Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network

dc.contributor.authorLevy, Kenneth D.
dc.contributor.authorBlake, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorFletcher-Hoppe, Colette
dc.contributor.authorFranciosi, James
dc.contributor.authorGoto, Diasuke
dc.contributor.authorHicks, James K.
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Ann M.
dc.contributor.authorKanuri, Sri Harsha
dc.contributor.authorMadden, Ebony B.
dc.contributor.authorMusty, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorOrlando, Lori
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Victoria M.
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorWu, Ryanne
dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-06T19:09:52Z
dc.date.available2019-08-06T19:09:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: While there is growing scientific evidence for and significant advances in the use of genomic technologies in medicine, there is a significant lag in the clinical adoption and sustainability of genomic medicine. Here we describe the findings from the National Human Genome Research Institute's (NHGRI) Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) Network in identifying key constructs, opportunities, and challenges associated with driving sustainability of genomic medicine in clinical practice. METHODS: Network members and affiliates were surveyed to identify key drivers associated with implementing and sustaining a genomic medicine program. Tallied results were used to develop and weigh key constructs/drivers required to support sustainability of genomic medicine programs. RESULTS: The top three driver-stakeholder dyads were (1) genomic training for providers, (2) genomic clinical decision support (CDS) tools embedded in the electronic health record (EHR), and (3) third party reimbursement for genomic testing. CONCLUSION: Priorities may differ depending on healthcare systems when comparing the current state of key drivers versus projected needs for supporting genomic medicine sustainability. Thus we provide gap-filling guidance based on IGNITE members' experiences. Although results are limited to findings from the IGNITE network, their implementation, scientific, and clinical experience may be used as a road map by others considering implementing genomic medicine programs.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationLevy, K. D., Blake, K., Fletcher-Hoppe, C., Franciosi, J., Goto, D., Hicks, J. K., … Ginsburg, G. S. (2019). Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 21(3), 743–747. doi:10.1038/s41436-018-0080-yen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20215
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s41436-018-0080-yen_US
dc.relation.journalGenetics in Medicineen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectGenomic educationen_US
dc.subjectGenomicsen_US
dc.subjectIGNITE Networken_US
dc.subjectImplementation scienceen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleOpportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms971858.pdf
Size:
346.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: