Do Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLST

dc.contributor.authorHickman, Susan E.
dc.contributor.authorTorke, Alexia M.
dc.contributor.authorSachs, Greg A.
dc.contributor.authorSudore, Rebecca L.
dc.contributor.authorTang, Qing
dc.contributor.authorBakoyannis, Giorgos
dc.contributor.authorHeim Smith, Nicholette
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Anne L.
dc.contributor.authorHammes, Bernard J.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T17:10:33Z
dc.date.available2023-05-05T17:10:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is essential to high-quality medical care that life-sustaining treatment orders match the current, values-based preferences of patients or their surrogate decision-makers. It is unknown whether concordance between orders and current preferences is higher when a POLST form is used compared to standard documentation practices. Objective: To assess concordance between existing orders and current preferences for nursing facility residents with and without POLST forms. Design: Chart review and interviews. Setting: Forty Indiana nursing facilities (29 where POLST is used and 11 where POLST is not in use). Participants: One hundred sixty-one residents able to provide consent and 197 surrogate decision-makers of incapacitated residents with and without POLST forms. Main measurements: Concordance was measured by comparing life-sustaining treatment orders in the medical record (e.g., orders about resuscitation, intubation, and hospitalization) with current preferences. Concordance was analyzed using population-averaged binary logistic regression. Inverse probability weighting techniques were used to account for non-response. We hypothesized that concordance would be higher in residents with POLST (n = 275) in comparison to residents without POLST (n = 83). Key results: Concordance was higher for residents with POLST than without POLST (59.3% versus 34.9%). In a model adjusted for resident, surrogate, and facility characteristics, the odds were 3.05 times higher that residents with POLST had orders for life-sustaining treatment match current preferences in comparison to residents without POLST (OR 3.05 95% CI 1.67-5.58, p < 0.001). No other variables were significantly associated with concordance. Conclusions: Nursing facility residents with POLST are significantly more likely than residents without POLST to have concordance between orders in their medical records and current preferences for life-sustaining treatments, increasing the likelihood that their treatment preferences will be known and honored. However, findings indicate further systems change and clinical training are needed to improve POLST concordance.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationHickman SE, Torke AM, Sachs GA, et al. Do Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLST. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(2):413-421. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06292-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32830
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11606-020-06292-1en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectNursing homeen_US
dc.subjectAdvance care planningen_US
dc.subjectPalliative careen_US
dc.titleDo Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLSTen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878602/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
11606_2020_Article_6292.pdf
Size:
280.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: