Promoting Meaning and Recovery for Psychosis: Comparison of Metacognitively-Oriented Psychotherapists and Clinicians in Psychiatric Rehabilitation

dc.contributor.authorFaith, Laura
dc.contributor.authorWiesepape, Courtney
dc.contributor.authorKukla, Marina
dc.contributor.authorLysaker, Paul
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatry, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T08:40:36Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T08:40:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-18
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recovery from psychosis is an expected and desired outcome in psychiatric rehabilitation that may involve subjective outcomes related to personal recovery. While a considerable amount of qualitative research has examined patients' experience of recovery oriented approaches, there are less studies examining clinicians' perspectives. Examining the clinician point of view is important for both supporting clinicians within recovery-oriented practice, as well as for understanding underlying therapeutic processes. The aims of this study were to explore clinician experience of offering different psychiatric rehabilitation treatments for individuals with psychosis, and to understand similarities and differences of clinicians whose work differed in its recovery emphasis. Methods: Open-ended interviews were conducted with 10 psychotherapists providing Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT), a recovery oriented form of integrative psychotherapy focused on subjective aspects of recovery, and 10 clinicians providing standard psychiatric rehabilitation services. Results: Thematic analysis revealed important similarities and differences between these two groups of providers. There were seven themes found for MERIT therapists: Comfort with uncertainty, Emphasis on collaboration, Being part of therapeutic change, Connecting with clients, Emphasis on patient autonomy, Experiencing growth, and Therapist use of self-awareness. There were four themes found for psychiatric rehabilitation clinicians: Value of a structured approach, Focus on a strengths-based approach, Witnessing behavioral change, and Building rapport to support the work. Discussion: As expected, both similarities and differences arose between clinician groups. Results indicated that both groups focused on the therapeutic relationship and monitoring progress and outcomes. Unexpectedly, MERIT therapists reported growth as well as comfort with uncertainty. These findings suggest that MERIT is a a psychotherapy that offers unique opportunities for creative and flexible exploration of meaning and agency that is both challenging and rewarding for clinicians. Implications for supporting healthy clinician practice and the development of services are discussed.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationFaith L, Wiesepape C, Kukla M, Lysaker P. Promoting Meaning and Recovery for Psychosis: Comparison of Metacognitively-Oriented Psychotherapists and Clinicians in Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023;19:2179-2194. Published 2023 Oct 18. doi:10.2147/NDT.S386004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39454
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherDove Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.2147/NDT.S386004
dc.relation.journalNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectPsychosis
dc.subjectRecovery
dc.subjectPsychotherapy
dc.subjectTherapeutic allianc
dc.subjectQualitative
dc.subjectClinician experience
dc.titlePromoting Meaning and Recovery for Psychosis: Comparison of Metacognitively-Oriented Psychotherapists and Clinicians in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ndt-19-2179.pdf
Size:
482.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: