Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorCroarkin, Paul E.
dc.contributor.authorElmaadawi, Ahmed Z.
dc.contributor.authorAaronson, Scott T.
dc.contributor.authorSchrodt, G. Randolph, Jr.
dc.contributor.authorHolbert, Richard C.
dc.contributor.authorVerdoliva, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHeart, Karen L.
dc.contributor.authorDemitrack, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorStrawn, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatry, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T16:17:18Z
dc.date.available2023-04-27T16:17:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) is prevalent and associated with a substantial psychosocial burden and mortality. There are few prior studies of interventions for TRD in adolescents. This was the largest study to date examining the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of 10-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for adolescents with TRD. Adolescents with TRD (aged 12-21 years) were enrolled in a randomized, sham-controlled trial of TMS across 13 sites. Treatment resistance was defined as an antidepressant treatment record level of 1 to 4 in a current episode of depression. Intention-to-treat patients (n = 103) included those randomly assigned to active NeuroStar TMS monotherapy (n = 48) or sham TMS (n = 55) for 30 daily treatments over 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-24) score. After 6 weeks of blinded treatment, improvement in the least-squares mean (SE) HAM-D-24 scores were similar between the active (-11.1 [2.03]) and sham groups (-10.6 [2.00]; P = 0.8; difference [95% CI], - 0.5 [-4.2 to 3.3]). Response rates were 41.7% in the active group and 36.4% in the sham group (P = 0.6). Remission rates were 29.2% in the active group and 29.0% in the sham group (P = 0.95). There were no new tolerability or safety signals in adolescents. Although TMS treatment produced a clinically meaningful change in depressive symptom severity, this did not differ from sham treatment. Future studies should focus on strategies to reduce the placebo response and examine the optimal dosing of TMS for adolescents with TRD.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationCroarkin PE, Elmaadawi AZ, Aaronson ST, et al. Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46(2):462-469. doi:10.1038/s41386-020-00829-yen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32670
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s41386-020-00829-yen_US
dc.relation.journalNeuropsychopharmacologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectMedical researchen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectPrefrontal cortexen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.titleLeft prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852515/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
41386_2020_Article_829.pdf
Size:
638.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: