Bullying Prevention in Schools: The Need for a Multiple Stakeholder Approach

Date
2020-07-30
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
IUPUI
Abstract

Since bullying is an ecological and systemic phenomenon that occurs in multiple contexts with multiple actors, it makes sense to consider the perceptions of multiple stakeholders and their relationships with one another and in relation to bullying prevention in schools. Using a non-probability, purposive sample, this study examined the perspectives of 45 school stakeholders, namely, principals, school social workers, bus drivers, and parents from an urban school district in the Midwest. The study unveils some of the implicit and explicit challenges associated with bullying prevention efforts. For example, bullying can be quite nebulous because people tend to look at the issue through the prism of their own experiences and positions, limiting their understanding of other stakeholders. Some stakeholders’ perspectives may be muted when bullying behaviors are discussed or reported. Overall, the findings support the use of multi-stakeholder approaches in developing a more holistic view of bullying. Recommendations include avoiding the reification of the views and voices of a select few and having a more open system of dialogue among stakeholders to create inclusion when addressing bullying.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Karikari, I., Brown, J. R., Ashirifi, G. D., & Storms, J. (2020). Bullying Prevention in Schools: The Need for a Multiple Stakeholder Approach. Advances in Social Work, 20(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.18060/22928
ISSN
2331-4125
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Advances in Social Work
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}