A task and performance analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) surgery

dc.contributor.authorCetinsaya, Berk
dc.contributor.authorGromski, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sangrock
dc.contributor.authorXia, Zhaohui
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Doga
dc.contributor.authorHalic, Tansel
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Coskun
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Cullen
dc.contributor.authorDe, Suvranu
dc.contributor.authorHegde, Sudeep
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Jonah
dc.contributor.authorSawhney, Mandeep
dc.contributor.authorStavropoulos, Stavros N.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daniel B.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-30T13:05:10Z
dc.date.available2020-03-30T13:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: ESD is an endoscopic technique for en bloc resection of gastrointestinal lesions. ESD is a widely-used in Japan and throughout Asia, but not as prevalent in Europe or the US. The procedure is technically challenging and has higher adverse events (bleeding, perforation) compared to endoscopic mucosal resection. Inadequate training platforms and lack of established training curricula have restricted its wide acceptance in the US. Thus, we aim to develop a Virtual Endoluminal Surgery Simulator (VESS) for objective ESD training and assessment. In this work, we performed task and performance analysis of ESD surgeries. METHODS: We performed a detailed colorectal ESD task analysis and identified the critical ESD steps for lesion identification, marking, injection, circumferential cutting, dissection, intraprocedural complication management, and post-procedure examination. We constructed a hierarchical task tree that elaborates the order of tasks in these steps. Furthermore, we developed quantitative ESD performance metrics. We measured task times and scores of 16 ESD surgeries performed by four different endoscopic surgeons. RESULTS: The average time of the marking, injection, and circumferential cutting phases are 203.4 (σ: 205.46), 83.5 (σ: 49.92), 908.4 s. (σ: 584.53), respectively. Cutting the submucosal layer takes most of the time of overall ESD procedure time with an average of 1394.7 s (σ: 908.43). We also performed correlation analysis (Pearson's test) among the performance scores of the tasks. There is a moderate positive correlation (R = 0.528, p = 0.0355) between marking scores and total scores, a strong positive correlation (R = 0.7879, p = 0.0003) between circumferential cutting and submucosal dissection and total scores. Similarly, we noted a strong positive correlation (R = 0.7095, p = 0.0021) between circumferential cutting and submucosal dissection and marking scores. CONCLUSIONS: We elaborated ESD tasks and developed quantitative performance metrics used in analysis of actual surgery performance. These ESD metrics will be used in future validation studies of our VESS simulator.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationCetinsaya, B., Gromski, M. A., Lee, S., Xia, Z., Demirel, D., Halic, T., Bayrak, C., Jackson, C., De, S., Hegde, S., Cohen, J., Sawhney, M., Stavropoulos, S. N., & Jones, D. B. (2019). A task and performance analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) surgery. Surgical endoscopy, 33(2), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6379-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22421
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00464-018-6379-6en_US
dc.relation.journalSurgical Endoscopyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectColorectal canceren_US
dc.subjectESDen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic submucosal dissectionen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic trainingen_US
dc.titleA task and performance analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1504326.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: