Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorMadden, Tessa
dc.contributor.authorHolttum, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorMaddipati, Ragini
dc.contributor.authorSecura, Gina M.
dc.contributor.authorNease, Robert F.
dc.contributor.authorPeipert, Jeffrey F.
dc.contributor.authorPoliti, Mary C.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-30T10:42:02Z
dc.date.available2023-03-30T10:42:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a contraceptive decision aid in reducing decisional conflict among women seeking reversible contraception. Study design: We conducted a randomized trial of a computer-based decision aid compared to a control group for women presenting for reversible contraception at two clinics affiliated with an academic medical center. The primary outcome was change in decisional conflict, measured before and after the healthcare visit using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. We hypothesized the decision aid would reduce the decisional conflict score by 10 points on a 100-point scale (0 = no conflict, 100 = high conflict) compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes included contraceptive method chosen and satisfaction with the healthcare visit. Results: We enrolled and randomized 253 women, and 241 had complete data for our primary outcome. Overall, pre-visit decisional conflict scores were low, reflecting low levels of decisional conflict in our sample; median score 15 (range 0-80) in the decision aid and 10 (0-85) in the control group (p = 0.45). Both groups had a similar reduction in median decisional conflict after the healthcare visit: -10 (-80 to 25) and -10 (-60 to 5) in the decision aid and control groups respectively (p = 0.99). Choice of contraception (p = 0.23) and satisfaction with healthcare provider (p = 0.79) also did not differ by study group. Conclusions: Decisional conflict around contraception was low in both groups at baseline. Use of a computerized contraceptive decision aid did not reduce decisional conflict, alter method choice, or impact satisfaction compared to the control group among women choosing reversible contraception. Implications: Use of a computerized contraceptive decision aid did not reduce decisional conflict or alter method choice compared to the control group among women choosing reversible contraception. Future studies could focus on testing the decision aid in different clinical settings, especially where barriers to providing comprehensive contraceptive counseling exist.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationMadden T, Holttum J, Maddipati R, et al. Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2020;102(5):339-345. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32123
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002en_US
dc.relation.journalContraceptionen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectContraceptionen_US
dc.subjectContraceptive counselingen_US
dc.subjectDecisional conflicten_US
dc.subjectPatient decision aiden_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1628816.pdf
Size:
622.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: