Even With Rehydration, Preservation in Ethanol Influences the Mechanical Properties of Bone and How Bone Responds to Experimental Manipulation

dc.contributor.authorVesper, Evan O.
dc.contributor.authorHammond, Max A.
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Matthew R.
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Joseph M.
dc.contributor.departmentBiomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-01T16:49:47Z
dc.date.available2018-08-01T16:49:47Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.description.abstractTypically, bones are harvested at the time of animal euthanasia and stored until mechanical testing. However, storage methods are not standardized, and differential effects on mechanical properties are possible between methods. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects that two common preservation methods (freezing wrapped in saline-soaked gauze and refrigerating ethanol fixed samples) have on bone mechanical properties in the context of an in vitro ribosylation treatment designed to modify mechanical integrity. It was hypothesized that there would be an interactive effect between ribose treatment and preservation method. Tibiae from twenty five 11week old female C57BL/6 mice were separated into 2 preservation groups. Micro-CT scans of contralateral pairs assessed differences in geometry prior to storage. After 7weeks of storage, bones in each pair of tibiae were soaked in a solution containing either 0M or 0.6M ribose for 1week prior to 4 point bending tests. There were no differences in any cortical geometric parameters between contralateral tibiae. There was a significant main effect of ethanol fixation on displacement to yield (-16.3%), stiffness (+24.5%), strain to yield (-13.9%), and elastic modulus (+18.5%) relative to frozen specimens. There was a significant main effect of ribose treatment for yield force (+13.9%), ultimate force (+9.2%), work to yield (+22.2%), yield stress (+14.1%), and resilience (+21.9%) relative to control-soaked bones. Postyield displacement, total displacement, postyield work, total work, total strain, and toughness were analyzed separately within each preservation method due to significant interactions. For samples stored frozen, all six properties were lower in the ribose-soaked group (49%-68%) while no significant effects of ribose were observed in ethanol fixed bones. Storage in ethanol likely caused changes to the collagen matrix which prevented or masked the embrittling effects of ribosylation that were seen in samples stored frozen wrapped in saline-soaked gauze. These data illustrate the clear importance of maintaining hydration if the eventual goal is to use bones for mechanical assessments and further show that storage in ethanol can alter potential to detect effects of experimental manipulation (in this case ribosylation).en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationVesper, E. O., Hammond, M. A., Allen, M. R., & Wallace, J. M. (2017). Even With Rehydration, Preservation in Ethanol Influences the Mechanical Properties of Bone and How Bone Responds to Experimental Manipulation. Bone, 97, 49–53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/16916
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.001en_US
dc.relation.journalBoneen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced glycation end productsen_US
dc.subjectCollagenen_US
dc.subjectCortical geometryen_US
dc.subjectMechanical testingen_US
dc.subjectMicro-computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRibosylationen_US
dc.titleEven With Rehydration, Preservation in Ethanol Influences the Mechanical Properties of Bone and How Bone Responds to Experimental Manipulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms841781.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: