A Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Reduce Burnout and Improve Quality of Care
If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2019-03
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Springer
Abstract
Clinician burnout is presumed to negatively impact healthcare quality; yet scant research has rigorously addressed this hypothesis. Using a mixed-methods, randomized, comparative effectiveness design, we tested two competing approaches to improve care—one addressing clinician burnout and the other addressing how clinicians interact with consumers—with 192 clinicians and 469 consumers at two community mental health centers. Although qualitative reports were promising, we found no comparative effectiveness for either intervention on burnout, patient-centered processes, or other outcomes. Discussion includes identifying ways to strengthen approaches to clinician burnout.
Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Salyers, M. P., Garabrant, J. M., Luther, L., Henry, N., Fukui, S., Shimp, D., … Rollins, A. L. (2019). A Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Reduce Burnout and Improve Quality of Care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 46(2), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-018-0908-4
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Permanent Link
Version
Author's manuscript