Utility of Revised Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity in Orthopaedic Trauma

Date
2025-06-03
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Wolters Kluwer
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the applicability of the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-Rev) in orthopaedic trauma and compare the predictive discrimination for the RAI-Rev and the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) for 30-day postoperative outcomes.

Design: This is a retrospective cohort study.

Setting: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was used.

Patient selection: All patients aged 18 or older who underwent surgical treatment for forearm, humerus, pelvis, acetabulum, femur, tibia, and hindfoot fractures from 2015 to 2020 were included.

Outcome: 30-day postoperative mortality, major complications, and wound complications consisting of surgical site infection, and wound dehiscence were measured.

Results: A total of 206,352 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 69 years, with 64.2% (n = 132,514) being female. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing frailty tiers in both RAI-Rev and mFI-5 were independent predictors of mortality, major complications, readmission, and wound complications. The cohort with the highest degree of frailty in both RAI-Rev and mFI-5 had the greatest risk of poor outcomes. RAI-Rev had significantly superior predictive discriminatory thresholds compared with mFI-5 for predicting 30-day mortality (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.84] and mFI-5 [0.67], P < 0.001), major complications (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.73] and mFI-5 [0.65], P < 0.001), and readmission (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.68] and mFI-5 [0.63], P < 0.001). However, mFI-5 outperformed RAI-Rev when predicting wound complications (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.52] and mFI-5 [0.55], P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The RAI-Rev tool demonstrated superior predictability of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates compared with mFI-5 but was less effective in predicting surgical site complications. These findings demonstrate the utility of RAI-Rev in anticipating postoperative complications in the setting of orthopaedic trauma, where optimizing surgical candidate selection is not always possible. Assessing the predicted morbidity and mortality through RAI-Rev enables surgeons to accurately identify patients at high risk of complications, which can further research investigation to mitigate this risk.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Soni C, Koltenyuk V, Gupta N, et al. Utility of Revised Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity in Orthopaedic Trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025;9(6):e25.00086. Published 2025 Jun 3. doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00086
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}