Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant For Refractory Macular Edema Caused by Retinal Vein Occlusion
dc.contributor.author | Hussain, Rehan M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ciulla, Thomas A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ciulla, Lauren M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sink, Bethany | |
dc.contributor.author | Harris, Alon | |
dc.contributor.department | Ophthalmology, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-25T18:56:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-25T18:56:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To investigate efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant in treating refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion. Methods: Retrospective chart review. Results: Twenty-two eyes with refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion were treated with a mean of 2.2 DEX over 12 months. Patient had previously received a mean of 7 treatments (laser, bevacizumab, and/or triamcinolone) for macular edema present for at least 4 months duration (mean 20.8 ± 17.6 months, range 4–72 months) before starting DEX. Mean baseline visual acuity was 20/91, and mean central subfield thickness was 506 μm. DEX improved mean best-corrected visual acuity to 20/75 and 20/66 at 7 weeks and 6 months follow-up, although it worsened to 20/132 at 12 months. Mean central subfield thickness improved to 292, 352, and 356 μm at 7 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between number of DEX treatments and central subfield thickness (P = 3.28 × 10−9). There was a statistically significant association between number of days followed and best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.006). Six of 12 (50%) phakic patients developed visually significant cataract requiring surgery. Five of 22 (23%) patients developed ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure > 30) and consequently did not undergo further treatment with DEX. Conclusion: DEX resulted in sustained anatomical reduction of retinal vein occlusion–associated refractory macular edema, although this did not translate into long-term best-corrected visual acuity improvement in either phakic or pseudophakic patients, possibly related to chronic structural alterations in the retina despite reduction of edema. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Hussain, R., Ciulla, T., Ciulla, L., Sink, B., & Harris, A. (2018). Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Refractory Macular Edema Caused by Retinal Vein Occlusion. Retinal Cases & Brief Reports, 12(4), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICB.0000000000000496 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/18959 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1097/ICB.0000000000000496 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Retinal Cases & Brief Reports | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | Author | en_US |
dc.subject | BRVO | en_US |
dc.subject | CRVO | en_US |
dc.subject | corticosteroids | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant For Refractory Macular Edema Caused by Retinal Vein Occlusion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |