Fluorotic Enamel Susceptibility to Dental Erosion and Fluoride Treatment

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cristiane Araújo Maia
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Frederico Barbosa
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Mier, Esperanza Angele
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Basílio Rodrigues
dc.contributor.authordo Nascimento, Johnatan Meireles
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson Takeo
dc.contributor.departmentDental Public Health and Dental Informatics, School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-13T09:13:41Z
dc.date.available2024-05-13T09:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this in vitro study was to test the hypothesis that fluoride treatment can prevent dental erosion on fluorotic enamel of different severities. It followed a 3×2 factorial design, considering a) fluorosis severity: sound (TF0, Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index), mild (TF1-2), moderate (TF3-4); and b) fluoride treatment: 0 (negative control) and 1150ppmF. Human molars with the three fluorosis severities (n=16, each) were selected and randomly assigned to the two fluoride treatments (n=8). Enamel blocks (4×4mm) were prepared from each tooth and subjected to a dental erosion cycling model, for 10 days. The daily cycling protocol consisted of erosive challenges (1% citric acid, pH 2.4), interspersed by periods of immersion in artificial saliva, and three 2-minute treatments with either 0 or 1150ppm F. The enamel volume loss (mm3) was calculated by subtracting values obtained by microtomography before and after cycling. Two-Way ANOVA showed no significant interaction between fluorosis severity and fluoride treatment (p=0.691), and no significant effect for either fluorosis severity (TF0 mean±standard-deviation: 13.5(10-2±0.42(10-2, TF1-2: 1.50(10-2±0.52(10-2, TF3-4: 1.24(10-2±0.52(10-2, p=0.416) or treatment (0ppmF: 1.49(10-2±0.53(10-2; 1150ppmF: 1.21(10-2±0.42(10-2; p=0.093), when evaluated independently. Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, the presence and severity of fluorosis in enamel do not appear to affect its susceptibility to dental erosion. Fluoride treatment was not effective in preventing the development of dental erosion in both sound and fluorotic enamel substrates under our experimental conditions.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationSilva CAM, Sousa FB, Martinez-Mier EA, Vieira BR, Nascimento JM, Hara AT. Fluorotic Enamel Susceptibility to Dental Erosion and Fluoride Treatment. Braz Dent J. 2023;34(6):75-81. doi:10.1590/0103-6440202305595
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40654
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherRibeirão Preto Dental Foundation
dc.relation.isversionof10.1590/0103-6440202305595
dc.relation.journalBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectDental fluorosis
dc.subjectDental erosion
dc.subjectFluoride
dc.subjectDental enamel
dc.subjectTooth wear
dc.titleFluorotic Enamel Susceptibility to Dental Erosion and Fluoride Treatment
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Silva2023Fluorotic-CCBY.pdf
Size:
2.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: