Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs
dc.contributor.author | Zigler, Rachel E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peipert, Jeffrey F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Qiuhong | |
dc.contributor.author | Maddipati, Ragini | |
dc.contributor.author | McNicholas, Colleen | |
dc.contributor.department | Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-07T17:13:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-07T17:13:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-01-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The objective of the study was to estimate the personal usage of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents in the United States and compare usage between programs with and without a Ryan Residency Training Program (Ryan Program), an educational program implemented to enhance resident training in family planning. Materials and methods: We performed a web-based, cross-sectional survey to explore contraceptive use among Ob/Gyn residents between November and December 2014. Thirty-two Ob/Gyn programs were invited to participate, and 24 programs (75%) agreed to participate. We divided respondents into two groups based on whether or not their program had a Ryan Program. We excluded male residents without a current female partner as well as residents who were currently pregnant or trying to conceive. We evaluated predictors of LARC use using bivariate analysis and multivariable Poisson regression. Results: Of the 638 residents surveyed, 384 (60.2%) responded to our survey and 351 were eligible for analysis. Of those analyzed, 49.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.1%, 54.5%) reported current LARC use: 70.0% of residents in Ryan Programs compared to 26.8% in non-Ryan Programs (RRadj 2.14, 95% CI 1.63-2.80). Residents reporting a religious affiliation were less likely to use LARC than those who described themselves as non-religious (RRadj 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.92). Of residents reporting LARC use, 91% were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Conclusion: LARC use in this population of women's health specialists is substantially higher than in the general population (49% vs. 12%). Ob/Gyn residents in programs affiliated with the Ryan Program were more likely to use LARC. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Zigler, R. E., Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Maddipati, R., & McNicholas, C. (2017). Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs. Open Access Journal of Contraception, 8, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S126771 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/16382 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Dove Press | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.2147/OAJC.S126771 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Open Access Journal of Contraception | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ | |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | LARC | en_US |
dc.subject | Ob/Gyn residents | en_US |
dc.subject | Contraception | en_US |
dc.subject | Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Family planning | en_US |
dc.title | Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |