A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy

dc.contributor.authorRex, Douglas K.
dc.contributor.authorBhandari, Raj
dc.contributor.authorDesta, Taddese
dc.contributor.authorDeMicco, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSchaeffer, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorEtzkorn, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorBarish, Charles
dc.contributor.authorPruitt, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorCash, Brooks D.
dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorTiongco, Felix
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Shelby
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, David
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T15:55:36Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T15:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. Methods We performed a randomized double-blind comparison of remimazolam to placebo for outpatient colonoscopy. This study design was a requirement of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. An additional group was randomized to open-label midazolam administered according to its package insert instructions (randomization ratio for remimazolam:placebo:midazolam was 30:6:10). Study medications were administered under the supervision of the endoscopist, without any involvement of an anesthesia specialist. Patients were given 50 to 75 μg of fentanyl before receiving study medications. Patients who failed to achieve adequate sedation in any arm were rescued with midazolam dosed at the investigator’s discretion. The primary endpoint was a composite that required 3 criteria be met: completion of the colonoscopy, no need for rescue medication, and ≤5 doses of remimazolam or placebo in any 15-minute interval (≤3 doses of midazolam in any 12-minute interval in the open-label midazolam arm). Results There were 461 randomized patients in 12 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was met for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 91.3%, 1.7%, and 25.2% of patients, respectively (P< 0.0001 for remimazolam vs placebo). Patients administered remimazolam received less fentanyl, had faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function, were ready for discharge faster, and felt back to normal faster than patients with both placebo and midazolam. Hypotension was less frequent with remimazolam and hypoxia occurred in 1% of subjects with remimazolam or midazolam. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events. Conclusion Remimazolam can be safely administered under the supervision of endoscopists for outpatient colonoscopy and allows faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function compared with placebo (midazolam rescue) and midazolam.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationRex, D. K., Bhandari, R., Desta, T., DeMicco, M., Schaeffer, C., Etzkorn, K., … Bernstein, D. (2018). A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2351en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/16128
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2351en_US
dc.relation.journalGastrointestinal Endoscopyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectprocedural sedationen_US
dc.subjectremimazolamen_US
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen_US
dc.titleA phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rex_2017_phase.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: