A Framework on Mandating Versus Incentivizing Corporate Social Responsibility

If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2015
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract

There are two primary but different methods of controlling behavior, whether it is the behavior of individuals or corporations: to incentivize it or to regulate it. Governments are in a unique position to employ either or both options because of their ability to pass regulatory schemes and to extend tax incentives. This article analyzes the two methods of shaping corporate behavior, examining the regulation issue through the case of the conflict minerals provision of the Dodd Frank Act and examining the taxation issue through several examples of corporate tax incentives. This article contributes to this field of literature by setting out a framework for analyzing the efficacy of regulations and incentives directed at shaping corporate behavior and corporate social responsibility.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Ryznar, M., & Woody, K. E. (2014). A Framework on Mandating versus Incentivizing Corporate Social Responsibility. Marquette Law Review, 98(4), pp. 1667-1694.
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Marquette Law Review
Source
SSRN
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}