A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Clinician Education Modules on Reducing Surgical Opioid Prescribing

dc.contributor.authorShallcross, Meagan L.
dc.contributor.authorStulberg, Jonah J.
dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, Willemijn L. A.
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Barbara A.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Reiping
dc.contributor.authorBilimoria, Karl Y.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Julie K.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T11:50:50Z
dc.date.available2025-02-04T11:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, we developed online interactive clinician education modules highlighting best practices to minimize opioid prescribing at discharge after surgery. The modules were implemented as part of a multicomponent quality improvement initiative across a six-hospital health system. This article describes the development and evaluation of this educational intervention. Materials and methods: Clinician education modules targeting surgical prescribers, nurses, and pharmacists were developed and implemented by an interdisciplinary team. Clinicians were invited to participate in an evaluation survey after completing the modules. Survey items assessed clinicians' rating of the module and intention to change clinical practice because of the module. Quantitative and qualitative survey responses were analyzed by the study team. Results: A total of 2119 clinicians completed the module and 1831 of these clinicians (86.4%) completed the survey. Of clinicians completing the survey, 65.6% reported that they intend to change clinical practice after completing the module. Intended changes were related to increased knowledge and awareness, provider empowerment, opioid prescribing practices, nonopioid prescribing practices, and patient education. Many clinicians who indicated they do not intend to change practice reported that their clinical practices were already in line with module recommendations. Some clinicians did not perceive the module to be relevant to their role. Conclusions: Module completion was associated with the intention to improve clinical practice in areas related to provider empowerment, opioid prescribing, nonopioid prescribing, and patient education. Evaluation data will inform future module improvements. There is an opportunity to ensure that all clinicians, including those who are not prescribers, recognize their role in opioid stewardship.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationShallcross ML, Stulberg JJ, Schäfer WLA, et al. A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Clinician Education Modules on Reducing Surgical Opioid Prescribing. J Surg Res. 2021;257:1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/45651
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.009
dc.relation.journalJournal of Surgical Research
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectClinician education
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectOpioid prescribing
dc.titleA Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Clinician Education Modules on Reducing Surgical Opioid Prescribing
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shallcross2021Mixed-AAM.pdf
Size:
80.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: