Can Science lead us to a Definition of Art?

dc.contributor.authorCoe, Kathryn
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-23T18:49:51Z
dc.date.available2016-12-23T18:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractFor approximately two thousand years, human thinkers have been attempting to define a behaviour, referred to as art, that humans have been practicing for tens of thousands of years. Defining this term has proved to be so difficult that Munro (1949: 5) to claim that the arts “are too intangible and changing to be defined or classified.” In this paper a 12-property cluster theory proposed by Denis Dutton is critically evaluated not in light of how well it fits with current thinking in aesthetics, but in light of its scientific strength and its usefulness for examining art across cultures.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationCoe, K. (2013). Can Science lead us to a Definition of Art?. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico, 6(2), 153-177.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11731
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFirenze University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.13128/Aisthesis-13775en_US
dc.relation.journalAisthesisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectevolutionary aestheticsen_US
dc.subjectDenis Duttonen_US
dc.subjectarten_US
dc.titleCan Science lead us to a Definition of Art?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
coe_2016_can.pdf
Size:
287.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: