Mandibulectomy Prosthetic Case Report: Comparisson of Traditional and Digital Fabrication Methods with 3DMD Face Scanning, Digital Sculpting, and 3-Dimensional Printing
dc.contributor.author | Bellichi, Travis | |
dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, Cade B.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood, Zebulun M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Qahtani, Nasser | |
dc.contributor.author | Alderson, Nicole | |
dc.contributor.author | Rogers, Jeff | |
dc.contributor.author | Haug, Stephen P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Levon, John A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-13T14:09:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-13T14:09:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description | Digitized for IUPUI ScholarWorks inclusion in 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | Maxillofacial silicone elastomer prostheses are used to replace facial features congenitally absent, surgically removed due to disease, or lost because of trauma. Traditional prosthetic fabrication (impression, wax-up, mold fabrication, and silicone processing) can be streamlined using digital scanning, and computer-assisted design and manufacturing. The purpose of this report is to improve traditional facial prosthetic workflow using facial scanning, digital prosthetic design, and 3-dimensional printing technology. In this clinical case report, we present two design and fabrication protocols for mandibulectomy prosthesis: traditional versus digital modeling and 3D printing. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/30338 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Mandibulectomy Prosthetic Case Report: Comparisson of Traditional and Digital Fabrication Methods with 3DMD Face Scanning, Digital Sculpting, and 3-Dimensional Printing | en_US |
dc.type | Poster | en_US |