Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, Or Not...

Date
2010
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Neal-Schuman Publishers
Abstract

The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because I believe that reference in the age of Wikipedia is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia we need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not…” We all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Our challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is we do and how it adds value.

Today I want to cover a number of topics. I’ll start with a definition and move to a consideration of alphabetical order. We will proceed to a short history lesson on three revolutions. Then I will present an opening quote and an example of the world we live in. We will then move to part one of a consideration of change using the work of Clayton Christensen. After an interlude with ChaCha, we will consider change in light of the work of Clay Shirky. After that we will sample some wisdom from Paul Krugman and Wired, looking at “Free” and “Better than Free.” We will finish with four questions, some answers, an uplifting quote, and a final challenge.

Description
Author's final version.
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Lewis, David W. “Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, Or Not...” in Reference Renaissance: Current and Future Trends. Edited by Marie Radford and R. David Lankes. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2010. Pages 3-16.
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Book chapter
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}