Harvest Tissue Source Does Not Alter the Protective Power of Stromal Cell Therapy Following Intestinal Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury

Abstract

Background Transplantation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be a novel treatment for intestinal ischemia. The optimal stromal cell source that could yield maximal protection following injury, however, has not been identified. We hypothesized that: 1) MSCs would increase survival and mesenteric perfusion, preserve intestinal histological architecture, and limit inflammation following intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/R), and 2) MSCs harvested from different sources of tissue would have equivalent protective properties to the intestine following I/R. Methods Adult male mice were anesthetized and a midline laparotomy performed. The intestines were eviscerated, the small bowel mesenteric root identified, and baseline intestinal perfusion was determined using Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI). Intestinal ischemia was established by temporarily occluding the superior mesenteric artery for 60 minutes with a non-crushing clamp. Following ischemia, the clamp was removed and the intestines were allowed to recover. Prior to abdominal closure, 2 × 106 human umbilical (USCs), bone-marrow (BMSCs) derived MSCs, or keratinocytes in 250μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) vehicle were injected into the peritoneum. Animals were allowed to recover for 12 or 24 hours (perfusion, histology, inflammatory studies), or 7 days (survival studies). Survival data was analyzed using log rank test. Perfusion was expressed as percentage of baseline and 12 and 24 hour data was analyzed using one way ANOVA and student’s t-test. Non parametric data was compared using Mann-Whitney-U test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was significant. Results All MSCs increased seven day survival following I/R and were superior to vehicle or keratinocytes (P<0.05). All MSCs increased mesenteric perfusion above vehicle at 12 and 24 hours following injury (P<0.05). All MSCs provided superior perfusion compared to keratinocytes at 24 hours post-injury (P<0.05). Administration of each MSC line improved intestinal histology after I/R (P<0.05). Multiple pro-inflammatory chemokines were down-regulated following application of MSCs suggesting a decreased inflammatory response following MSC therapy. Conclusion Transplantation of MSCs following intestinal I/R, irrespective of source tissue, significantly increases survival and mesenteric perfusion while limiting intestinal damage and inflammation. Further studies are needed to identify the mechanism that these cells utilize to promote improved outcomes following injury.