Influence of Toothbrush Abrasion and Surface Treatments on Roughness and Gloss of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramics

dc.contributor.authorLabban, Nawaf
dc.contributor.authorAl Amri, Mohammad D.
dc.contributor.authorAlnafaiy, Sarah M.
dc.contributor.authorAlhijji, Saleh M.
dc.contributor.authorAlenizy, Mohammad A.
dc.contributor.authorIskandar, Mounir
dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Sabrina
dc.contributor.departmentBiomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-03T17:08:13Z
dc.date.available2023-04-03T17:08:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-27
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the surface roughness and gloss of polymer-infiltrated ceramics after simulated in vitro toothbrushing in different storage mediums. Four polymer- infiltrated ceramics were evaluated, Lava ultimate (LU), Vita enamic (EN), Shofu (SH), and Crystal ultra (CU). The control group was a feldspathic ceramic, Vita Mark II (VM). One hundred and twenty specimens (12 × 14 × 2.5 mm) were prepared using a precision saw. For each material (n = 24), the specimens were allocated into two groups, polished and stained. The specimens of each group were stored (for 7 days) in either citric acid (0.2N) or distilled water. Data for surface gloss (ΔE*SCE-SCI) and roughness (Ra) were evaluated before (baseline) and after simulated toothbrushing. For toothbrushing simulation, a toothpaste slurry containing a toothpaste of 100 relative dentin abrasion (RDA) and 0.3 ml distilled water was used for 3650 cycles (7300 strokes) for each specimen. Data were analyzed using t-test and ANOVA. A p-value of ≤ to 0.05 was considered significant. The highest mean value of surface gloss was identified in CU (stained-water) (4.3 (0.47)) (ΔE*) and EN (stained-acid) (4.3 (1.00)) (ΔE*) specimens, whereas the lowest mean value was shown by SH (stained-acid) (2.04 (0.42)) (ΔE*) samples. The highest mean value of surface roughness was observed in SH (0.40 (0.99)) Ra (stained-acid) whereas the lowest in VM (0.13 (0.039)) Ra (polished- water). A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed in surface roughness and gloss between the materials with simulated toothbrushing, except in VM and LU, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that simulated toothbrushing impacts on surface roughness and gloss, irrespective of the storage medium.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLabban N, Al Amri MD, Alnafaiy SM, et al. Influence of Toothbrush Abrasion and Surface Treatments on Roughness and Gloss of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramics. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(21):3694. Published 2021 Oct 27. doi:10.3390/polym13213694en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32191
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/polym13213694en_US
dc.relation.journalPolymersen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAbrasionen_US
dc.subjectCitric aciden_US
dc.subjectPolymer-infiltrated ceramicen_US
dc.subjectSurface glossen_US
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Toothbrush Abrasion and Surface Treatments on Roughness and Gloss of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
polymers-13-03694.pdf
Size:
3.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: