How Many SARS-CoV-2–Infected People Require Hospitalization? Using Random Sample Testing to Better Inform Preparedness Efforts

dc.contributor.authorMenachemi, Nir
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Brian E.
dc.contributor.authorWools-Kaloustian, Kara K.
dc.contributor.authorYiannoutsos, Constantin T.
dc.contributor.authorHalverson, Paul K.
dc.contributor.departmentEpidemiology, School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T21:44:34Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T21:44:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractContext: Existing hospitalization ratios for COVID-19 typically use case counts in the denominator, which problematically underestimates total infections because asymptomatic and mildly infected persons rarely get tested. As a result, surge models that rely on case counts to forecast hospital demand may be inaccurately influencing policy and decision-maker action. Objective: Based on SARS-CoV-2 prevalence data derived from a statewide random sample (as opposed to relying on reported case counts), we determine the infection-hospitalization ratio (IHR), defined as the percentage of infected individuals who are hospitalized, for various demographic groups in Indiana. Furthermore, for comparison, we show the extent to which case-based hospitalization ratios, compared with the IHR, overestimate the probability of hospitalization by demographic group. Design: Secondary analysis of statewide prevalence data from Indiana, COVID-19 hospitalization data extracted from a statewide health information exchange, and all reported COVID-19 cases to the state health department. Setting: State of Indiana as of April 30, 2020. Main Outcome Measure(s): Demographic-stratified IHRs and case-hospitalization ratios. Results: The overall IHR was 2.1% and varied more by age than by race or sex. Infection-hospitalization ratio estimates ranged from 0.4% for those younger than 40 years to 9.2% for those older than 60 years. Hospitalization rates based on case counts overestimated the IHR by a factor of 10, but this overestimation differed by demographic groups, especially age. Conclusions: In this first study of the IHR based on population prevalence, our results can improve forecasting models of hospital demand—especially in preparation for the upcoming winter period when an increase in SARS CoV-2 infections is expected.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationMenachemi, N., Dixon, B. E., Wools-Kaloustian, K. K., Yiannoutsos, C. T., & Halverson, P. K. (2021). How Many SARS-CoV-2–Infected People Require Hospitalization? Using Random Sample Testing to Better Inform Preparedness Efforts. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 27(3), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001331en_US
dc.identifier.issn1078-4659en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/30503
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/PHH.0000000000001331en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Public Health Management and Practiceen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectcase-hospitalization ratioen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjecthospitalization rateen_US
dc.subjectinfection-hospitalization ratioen_US
dc.titleHow Many SARS-CoV-2–Infected People Require Hospitalization? Using Random Sample Testing to Better Inform Preparedness Effortsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Menachemi2021How-AAM.pdf
Size:
308.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: