Pancreatic enzyme supplementation versus placebo for improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms in non-responsive celiac disease: A cross-over randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorYoosuf, Shakira
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Caitlin G.
dc.contributor.authorPapamichael, Konstantinos
dc.contributor.authorMadoff, Sarah E.
dc.contributor.authorKurada, Satya
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, Jocelyn A.
dc.contributor.authorTherrien, Amelie
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Prashant
dc.contributor.authorDennis, Melinda
dc.contributor.authorLeffler, Daniel A.
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Ciaran P.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T09:40:53Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T09:40:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-04
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency (PEI) is a possible cause of recurrent/persistent symptoms in celiac disease. Although pancreatic enzyme supplementation may be used to treat non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD) in clinical practice, clinical outcomes are variable and there is limited and low quality evidence to support this practice. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of pancreatic enzyme supplements (PES) for improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms in NRCD. Methods: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial in adults with NRCD examining Celiac Disease-Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (CeD-GSRS) scores on PES (pancrelipase co-administered with omeprazole) versus placebo (omeprazole only) during a 10-day treatment period. The study was registered under the clinical trials registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ number, NCT02475369) on 18 Jun 2015. Results: Twelve participants (nine female) were included in the per-protocol analysis; one participant had low fecal elastase-1. Pancrelipase was not associated with significant change in CeD-GSRS compared to placebo (-0.03 versus -0.26; P = 0.366). There was a significant decrease in mean values of total CeD-GSRS scores (3.58 versus 2.90, P = 0.004), abdominal pain (2.92 versus 2.42, P = 0.009), and diarrhea sub-scores (3.44 versus 2.92, P = 0.037) during the run-in period with omeprazole. Conclusion: In this prospective, cross-over randomized, placebo-controlled study, PES did not improve symptoms in patients with NRCD. It is unclear whether this is a trial effect or related to administration of omeprazole.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationYoosuf S, Barrett CG, Papamichael K, et al. Pancreatic enzyme supplementation versus placebo for improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms in non-responsive celiac disease: A cross-over randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;9:1001879. Published 2023 Jan 4. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1001879
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/36539
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.isversionof10.3389/fmed.2022.1001879
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Medicine
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectDiarrhea
dc.subjectSprue
dc.subjectMalabsorption
dc.subjectExocrine pancreatic insufficiency
dc.subjectProton pump inhibitors
dc.subjectPancreas
dc.subjectDyspepsia
dc.titlePancreatic enzyme supplementation versus placebo for improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms in non-responsive celiac disease: A cross-over randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fmed-09-1001879.pdf
Size:
549.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: