First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones

dc.contributor.authorHall, M. Kennedy
dc.contributor.authorThiel, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorDunmire, Barbrina
dc.contributor.authorSamson, Patrick C.
dc.contributor.authorKessler, Ross
dc.contributor.authorSunaryo, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSweet, Robert M.
dc.contributor.authorMetzler, Ian S.
dc.contributor.authorChang, Helena C.
dc.contributor.authorGunn, Martin
dc.contributor.authorDighe, Manjiri
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Layla
dc.contributor.authorPopchoi, Christina
dc.contributor.authorManaguli, Ravi
dc.contributor.authorCunitz, Bryan W.
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Barbara H.
dc.contributor.authorDing, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, Brianna
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ziyue
dc.contributor.authorSorensen, Mathew D.
dc.contributor.authorWessells, Hunter
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Jonathan D.
dc.contributor.departmentBiostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T11:19:44Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T11:19:44Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Our goal was to test transcutaneous focused ultrasound in the form of ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy to reposition ureteral stones and facilitate passage in awake subjects. Materials and methods: Adult subjects with a diagnosed proximal or distal ureteral stone were prospectively recruited. Ultrasonic propulsion alone or with burst wave lithotripsy was administered by a handheld transducer to awake, unanesthetized subjects. Efficacy outcomes included stone motion, stone passage, and pain relief. Safety outcome was the reporting of associated anticipated or adverse events. Results: Twenty-nine subjects received either ultrasonic propulsion alone (n = 16) or with burst wave lithotripsy bursts (n = 13), and stone motion was observed in 19 (66%). The stone passed in 18 (86%) of the 21 distal ureteral stone cases with at least 2 weeks follow-up in an average of 3.9±4.9 days post-procedure. Fragmentation was observed in 7 of the burst wave lithotripsy cases. All subjects tolerated the procedure with average pain scores (0-10) dropping from 2.1±2.3 to 1.6±2.0 (P = .03). Anticipated events were limited to hematuria on initial urination post-procedure and mild pain. In total, 7 subjects had associated discomfort with only 2.2% (18 of 820) propulsion bursts. Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy and safety of using ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy in awake subjects to reposition and break ureteral stones to relieve pain and facilitate passage.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationHall MK, Thiel J, Dunmire B, et al. First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones. J Urol. 2022;208(5):1075-1082. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000002864
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/37476
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/JU.0000000000002864
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Urology
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectCalculi
dc.subjectLithotripsy
dc.subjectUrolithiasis
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.titleFirst Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1880105.pdf
Size:
636.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: