Incidence and risk factors for non-union of the superior ramus osteotomy when hip dysplasia is treated with periacetabular osteotomy

dc.contributor.authorSivamurugan, Ganesh
dc.contributor.authorWestermann, Robert W.
dc.contributor.authorGlass, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorDavison, John C.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Aspen
dc.contributor.authorHenrichsen, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorMcKinley, Todd O.
dc.contributor.authorWilley, Michael C.
dc.contributor.departmentOrthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T11:39:41Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T11:39:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-12
dc.description.abstractPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. Few studies report risk factors for the development of superior ramus osteotomy non-union. The purpose of this investigation was to document the incidence and risk factors for this complication. We identified 316 consecutive hips that underwent PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. We developed and validated a technique to measure the superior ramus osteotomy location on anterior-posterior (AP) pelvis radiographs and computed tomography. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate the relationships between odds of non-union and potential demographic and radiographic predictor variables in univariate and multivariate analyses. Twenty-nine (9.2%) hips developed superior ramus non-union. Age {median [interquartile range (IQR)] 23 years (18-35) healed versus 35 years (26-40) non-united, P = 0.001}, pre-operative lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) [16° (11-20) healed versus 10° (6-13) non-united, P < 0.001] and the distance from the superior ramus osteotomy to the ilioishial line [15.8 mm (13.2-18.7) healed versus 18.1 mm (16.2-20.5) non-united, P < 0.001] varied significantly between groups. Using multivariate analysis, moderate-to-severe dysplasia [LCEA < 15°, odds ratio (OR) 5.95, standard error (SE) 3.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.99-17.79, P = 0.001], increased age (5-year increase, OR 1.29, SE 3.32, 95% CI 1.105-1.60, P-value = 0.018) and distance from the ilioishial line (3-mm increase, OR 1.67, SE 0.22, 95% CI 1.29-2.18, P < 0.001) were at increased risk of developing non-union. Superior ramus osteotomy non-union is common after PAO. Older age, moderate-to-severe dysplasia, and more medial osteotomy location were independent risk factors for non-union. Consideration should be made in high-risk patients for a more lateral superior ramus osteotomy and adjuvant medical and surgical interventions.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationSivamurugan G, Westermann RW, Glass N, et al. Incidence and risk factors for non-union of the superior ramus osteotomy when hip dysplasia is treated with periacetabular osteotomy. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023;10(2):80-86. Published 2023 Apr 12. doi:10.1093/jhps/hnad006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39475
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/jhps/hnad006
dc.relation.journalJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO)
dc.subjectHip dysplasia
dc.subjectSuperior ramus osteotomy
dc.titleIncidence and risk factors for non-union of the superior ramus osteotomy when hip dysplasia is treated with periacetabular osteotomy
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
hnad006.pdf
Size:
1.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: