In Vitro Comparison of Direct Attachment Shape and Size on the Orthodontic Forces and Moments Generated by Thermoplastic Aligners During Expansion

dc.contributor.authorLear, Megann
dc.contributor.authorAkbari, Amin
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Olivia
dc.contributor.authorMagura, Janine
dc.contributor.authorBojrab, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorEckert, George
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jie
dc.contributor.authorConley, Richard Scott
dc.contributor.authorTurkkahraman, Hakan
dc.contributor.departmentOrthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-21T14:05:08Z
dc.date.available2025-04-21T14:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the effects of varying direct attachment shape and size on the forces and moments generated by thermoplastic aligners during simulated expansion. Materials and methods: An in vitro orthodontic force tester (OFT) was used to measure the forces and moments from a typodont where the buccal teeth were translated lingually 0.2 mm to simulate expansion. Hemi-ellipsoid and rectangular attachments with either 0.5 or 1.0 mm thickness were added on upper right first premolar (UR4), second premolar (UR5) and first molar (UR6). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine two-way interactions among the factors on the outcomes. Results: The interactions between group and tooth were significant for all outcomes (p < 0.001). The greatest buccal forces (Fy) were observed with 1 mm rectangular attachment on the UR4 (0.78 ± 0.29 N), with 1 mm hemi-ellipsoid attachment on UR5 (0.28 ± 0.21 N) and with 0.5 mm rectangular attachment on UR6 (1.71 ± 0.18 N). The greatest buccolingual moments (Mx) were obtained with 1 mm rectangular attachment on UR4 (5.61 ± 1.43 Nmm), without any attachments on UR5 (3.33 ± 1.73 Nmm) and with 1 mm hemi-ellipsoid attachment on UR6 (4.18 ± 4.31). Conclusion: Direct attachment shape and size had a significant effect on the orthodontic forces and moments generated by thermoplastic aligners during simulated expansion. Although loads varied significantly by tooth morphology and its location in the arch, best forces and moments for expansion were obtained with 1 mm rectangular attachments on UR4s, 1 mm hemi-ellipsoid attachments on UR5s and 0.5 mm rectangular attachments on UR6s.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationLear M, Akbari A, Robertson O, et al. In Vitro Comparison of Direct Attachment Shape and Size on the Orthodontic Forces and Moments Generated by Thermoplastic Aligners During Expansion. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025;28(2):242-252. doi:10.1111/ocr.12865
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/47235
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/ocr.12865
dc.relation.journalOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectBiomechanical phenomena
dc.subjectClear aligner appliance
dc.subjectOrthodontic appliance design
dc.subjectTooth movement techniques
dc.titleIn Vitro Comparison of Direct Attachment Shape and Size on the Orthodontic Forces and Moments Generated by Thermoplastic Aligners During Expansion
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lear2025InVitro-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
2.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: