A retrospective comparison of antibiotic regimens for preterm premature rupture of membranes

Date
2014-09
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer) - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of ampicillin and azithromycin leads to a similar latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes as ampicillin and erythromycin and whether the substitution of azithromycin for erythromycin effects rates of other outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 completed weeks of gestation and compared two groups: those who received ampicillin and erythromycin and those who received ampicillin and azithromycin. Primary outcome was length of latency (defined as time from first antibiotic dose to delivery) and secondary outcomes were rates of chorioamnionitis, cesarean delivery, Apgar scores, birth weight, neonatal death, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. RESULTS: Of 168 women who met inclusion criteria, 75 received ampicillin and erythromycin and 93 received ampicillin and azithromycin. There was no difference in latency between groups: 9.6±13.2 days (erythromycin) compared with 9.4±10.0 (azithromycin) days (P=.40). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. We had 80% power to detect a difference of 5 days. CONCLUSION: Among women with preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 completed weeks of gestation, substitution of azithromycin for erythromycin in the recommended antibiotic regimen did not affect latency or any other measured maternal or fetal outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Pierson, R. C., Gordon, S. S., & Haas, D. M. (2014). A Retrospective Comparison of Antibiotic Regimens for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 124(3), 515–519. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000426
ISSN
1873-233X
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Rights
Publisher Policy
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}