Postpartum "Fit": Making Space for Feminist Mothering and Mom Bodies in Academic Spaces

dc.contributor.authorBrooks-Gillies, Marilee
dc.contributor.authorJorgenson Borchert, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T19:49:09Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T19:49:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractOur article discusses how our dress practices have worked to “modify” our bodies as mothers. Eicher (2000) noted how dress practices are actions individuals undertake to modify and supplement the body in order to address physical needs in social spaces. While academic spaces often proclaim “body positivity” out loud (if not in practice), as postpartum academics we sometimes find it hard to embrace body positivity and reconcile the role of mother with our other identity positions. As female Writing Program Administrators (WPAs) of a Writing Center (WC) and a Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) program respectively, we are keenly aware of our discipline’s “feminized” and “nurturing” identity as something that’s been actively resisted since the feminine is seen as inferior (Grustch McKinney, 2013; Nicholas, 2004). This is particularly true in WCs where “cozy” spaces are cause for distress because “if the writing center is a home and staff is family, that makes the director the mother” (Grutsch McKinney, 2013, p. 26). In other words, presenting as mothers can undermine our identities as serious scholars and administrators. Instead, our article embraces the notion of “feminist mothering” (Miley, 2016; O’Reilly, 2008) and “reclaim our nurturing (mothering) work as empowering, vital work within the institution” (Miley, 2016, p. 2). We contend that the practice of mothering and the bodies of mothers are not impediments to professional spaces and identities. Our article explores the concept of “fit” and examines how our postpartum bodies and our embodied identities and practices as mothers can “fit” in academic spaces. We do not equate our roles as mothers as inferior parts of our identities. We share stories of how we craft our academic personas to negotiate implicit dress codes and embodied norms in academic spaces: sometimes we try to “fit” and other times we stretch the boundaries of those norms recognizing the need for a wider view of what bodies and practices belong in academia.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrooks-Gillies, Marilee and Jessica Jorgenson Borchert. “Postpartum ‘Fit’: Making Space for Feminist Mothering and Mom Bodies in Academic Spaces.” Dress Practices as Embodied Multimodal Rhetoric, a special issue of the Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, http://journalofmultimodalrhetorics.com/3-2-issue-brooks-gillies-and-borcherten_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/25945
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Multimodal Rhetoricsen_US
dc.subjectembodimenten_US
dc.subjectwriting center administrationen_US
dc.subjectfeminist motheringen_US
dc.subjectspace/placeen_US
dc.subjectspaceen_US
dc.subjectdress practicesen_US
dc.subjectwriting program administrationen_US
dc.titlePostpartum "Fit": Making Space for Feminist Mothering and Mom Bodies in Academic Spacesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3.2 Issue Brooks-Gillies and Borchert.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: