An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework

dc.contributor.authorShui, Michelle L.
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Weronika
dc.contributor.authorAltendahl, Marie
dc.contributor.authorShanks, Anthony L.
dc.contributor.authorSims, Shireen M.
dc.contributor.authorRatan, Rini B.
dc.contributor.authorSaab, Said S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T18:59:24Z
dc.date.available2025-05-19T18:59:24Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite existing guidelines for writing clerkship summative assessment narratives, their quality, structure, and utility remain variable. Categorizing Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) narratives using a framework can reveal patterns and gaps in content, offering actionable insights. Objective: This study aimed to (1) categorize MSPE narrative comments using the PRIME+ framework (professionalism, reporting, interpreting, managing, and educating, and areas for improvement [+]), and (2) examine differences in length and content by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final clerkship grade. Methods: Seven hundred twenty applications to our obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency program in 2023 were reviewed, focusing on the OB/GYN core clerkship narrative. Narratives were categorized using the PRIME+ framework, and differences in length and content were assessed by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final grade. Differences between groups were evaluated with nonparametric tests. Results: Six hundred fifty-three narratives from 231 medical schools were included. Fifty-one unique grading systems were reported. PRIME+ domains were represented as follows: professionalism (94.8%, 619 of 653), reporter (71.1%, 464 of 653), interpreter (37.5%, 245 of 653), manager (69.1%, 451 of 653), educator (69.7%, 455 of 653), and areas for improvement (3.7%, 24 of 653). For each domain, <13% of narratives included ≥1 specific example. Median word count differed between US-based (155 words; 95% CI, 148-162) and international (61 words; 95% CI, 51-75) applicants (P=.001). Students earning “honors” had longer narratives (median words 149; 95% CI, 131-164 vs 117; 95% CI, 97-134; P=.001) with more specific examples (1.2 examples; 95% CI, 0.97-1.4 vs 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.2; P=.024) and advanced PRIME+ domains, specifically educator (P=.016). The number of specific examples differed by race (P=.02) but not gender. Conclusions: MSPE narratives for the OB/GYN clerkship demonstrate variability in content and length.
dc.identifier.citationShui ML, Armstrong W, Altendahl M, Shanks A, Sims SM, Ratan RB, Saab SS. An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2025 Apr 1;17(2):189-95. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00660.1.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/48239
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherACGME
dc.relation.isversionof10.4300/JGME-D-24-00660.1
dc.titleAn Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shui 2025.pdf
Size:
270.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: