An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework

Date
2025-04
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
ACGME
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Background: Despite existing guidelines for writing clerkship summative assessment narratives, their quality, structure, and utility remain variable. Categorizing Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) narratives using a framework can reveal patterns and gaps in content, offering actionable insights. Objective: This study aimed to (1) categorize MSPE narrative comments using the PRIME+ framework (professionalism, reporting, interpreting, managing, and educating, and areas for improvement [+]), and (2) examine differences in length and content by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final clerkship grade. Methods: Seven hundred twenty applications to our obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency program in 2023 were reviewed, focusing on the OB/GYN core clerkship narrative. Narratives were categorized using the PRIME+ framework, and differences in length and content were assessed by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final grade. Differences between groups were evaluated with nonparametric tests. Results: Six hundred fifty-three narratives from 231 medical schools were included. Fifty-one unique grading systems were reported. PRIME+ domains were represented as follows: professionalism (94.8%, 619 of 653), reporter (71.1%, 464 of 653), interpreter (37.5%, 245 of 653), manager (69.1%, 451 of 653), educator (69.7%, 455 of 653), and areas for improvement (3.7%, 24 of 653). For each domain, <13% of narratives included ≥1 specific example. Median word count differed between US-based (155 words; 95% CI, 148-162) and international (61 words; 95% CI, 51-75) applicants (P=.001). Students earning “honors” had longer narratives (median words 149; 95% CI, 131-164 vs 117; 95% CI, 97-134; P=.001) with more specific examples (1.2 examples; 95% CI, 0.97-1.4 vs 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.2; P=.024) and advanced PRIME+ domains, specifically educator (P=.016). The number of specific examples differed by race (P=.02) but not gender. Conclusions: MSPE narratives for the OB/GYN clerkship demonstrate variability in content and length.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Shui ML, Armstrong W, Altendahl M, Shanks A, Sims SM, Ratan RB, Saab SS. An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2025 Apr 1;17(2):189-95. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00660.1.
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}