Active Aβ immunotherapy CAD106 in Alzheimer's disease: A phase 2b study

dc.contributor.authorVandenberghe, Rik
dc.contributor.authorRiviere, Marie-Emmanuelle
dc.contributor.authorCaputo, Angelika
dc.contributor.authorSovago, Judit
dc.contributor.authorMaguire, R. Paul
dc.contributor.authorFarlow, Martin
dc.contributor.authorMarotta, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Valle, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorScheltens, Philip
dc.contributor.authorRyan, J. Michael
dc.contributor.authorGraf, Ana
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-27T18:34:42Z
dc.date.available2017-10-27T18:34:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 90-week study assessed safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of CAD106 with/without adjuvant in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods One hundred twenty-one patients received up to seven intramuscular injections of CAD106 (150 μg or 450 μg) or placebo ± adjuvant over 60 weeks. An amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) substudy was also conducted. Results CAD106 induced strong serological responses (amyloid-beta [Aβ]–Immunoglobuline G[IgG]) in 55.1% (150 μg) and 81.1% (450 μg) of patients (strong serological responders [SSRs]). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 24.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7–33.8) of the patients in the active treatment group and in 6.7% (95% CI 0.2–31.9) in the placebo group. Three of the SAEs were classified as possibly related to study drug by the investigators. No evidence of central nervous system inflammation was found. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) occurred in six cases, all of them were strong serological responders. None of the ARIAs were symptomatic. Serum Aβ-IgG titer area under the curves correlated negatively with amyloid PET standardized uptake value ratio percentage change from baseline to week 78 within the CAD106-treated patients (r = −0.84, P = .0004). Decrease in cortical gray-matter volume from baseline to week 78 was larger in SSRs than in controls (P = .0077). Discussion Repeated CAD106 administration was generally well tolerated. CAD106 450 μg with alum adjuvant demonstrated the best balance between antibody response and tolerability.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationVandenberghe, R., Riviere, M. E., Caputo, A., Sovago, J., Maguire, R. P., Farlow, M., ... & Graf, A. (2017). Active Aβ immunotherapy CAD106 in Alzheimer's disease: A phase 2b study. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 3(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2016.12.003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/14396
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.trci.2016.12.003en_US
dc.relation.journalAlzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventionsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectAlzheimer's Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectCAD106en_US
dc.subjectactive immunotherapyen_US
dc.titleActive Aβ immunotherapy CAD106 in Alzheimer's disease: A phase 2b studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Vandenberghe_2017_active.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: